Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BIBLvsAFLGETF Comparison
Inspire 100 ESG ETF (BIBL) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BIBL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate. In contrast, AFLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. BIBL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.41%, versus 0.55% for AFLG. BIBL is up 7.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. AFLG performs worse with 1.09% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BIBL and AFLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BIBL vs AFLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BIBL AFLG | -2.11%-3.01% | +6.04%-0.07% | +7.80%+1.09% | +28.19%+19.95% | +66.48%+77.90% | +58.13%+76.51% |
| Flows | BIBL AFLG | +$12M+$20M | +$5M+$22M | +$5M+$16M | +$15M+$227M | -$45M+$425M | +$118M+$423M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BIBL AFLG | +17.58%+11.47% | +20.10%+17.18% | +16.99%+14.14% | +19.63%+16.20% |
| Max drawdown | BIBL AFLG | -4.94%-3.62% | -14.51%-12.96% | -20.33%-17.58% | -30.90%-23.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | BIBL AFLG | 27d14d | 45d45d | 233d205d | 812d741d |
BIBL | AFLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.30 | $39.14 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $48.32 | $39.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BIBL | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BIBL | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.30 | $39.14 |
| 1D performance | -2.11% | -1.14% |
| AuM | $393.90 M | $485.08 M |
| E/R | 0.41% | 0.55% |
BIBL | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Inspire ETFs | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Inspire 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 235 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 31, 2017 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BIBL and AFLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BIBL is up 7.8% year-to-date (YTD), while AFLG has returned 1.09%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BIBL or AFLG?
Year-to-date, the BIBL ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$16M for AFLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: BIBL or AFLG?
Over the past year, BIBL had a volatility of 20.1%, while AFLG experienced 17.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: BIBL or AFLG?
As of March 10, 2026, BIBL holds $393.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFLG manages $485.08 M.
What sectors do the BIBL and AFLG ETFs invest in?
BIBL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate. Meanwhile, AFLG focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the BIBL ETF and AFLG ETF?
BIBL top holdings include CATERPILLAR, KLA CORPORATION and ARISTA NETWORKS. AFLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: BIBL or AFLG?
BIBL holds 98 securities with 47.88% of its assets in the top 15. AFLG has 245 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.87%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
