BGDVvsUSEWETF Comparison
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Cambria US EW ETF (USEW) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. BGDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.25% for USEW. BGDV is up 8.67% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. USEW performs worse with 4.41% YTD performance, and -$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BGDV and USEW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BGDV vs USEW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGDV USEW | +7.36%+7.39% | +5.05%+2.25% | +8.67%+4.41% | +27.76%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BGDV USEW | +$2M-$634K | -$2M-$3M | -$2M-$14M | +$7M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BGDV USEW | +13.74%+14.39% | +11.57%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BGDV USEW | -8.47%-7.88% | -8.47%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BGDV USEW | 46d77d | 46dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
BGDV | USEW | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.68 | |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $29.73 | |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BGDV | USEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.68 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.18% | – |
| AuM | $770.48 M | $180.62 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.25% |
BGDV | USEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Bahl & Gaynor | Cambria |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 2943 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2024 | December 18, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
