BGDVvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. BGDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.15% for RECS. BGDV is up 13.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$506K in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 8.35% YTD performance, and +$679M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BGDV and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BGDV vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/20/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGDV RECS | -0.40%+2.83% | +4.78%+5.00% | +13.14%+8.35% | +22.27%+19.46% | n/a+73.95% | n/a+94.98% |
| Flows | BGDV RECS | +$2M+$38M | +$2M+$236M | -$506K+$679M | -$2M+$2.01B | -+$4.48B | -+$4.68B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BGDV RECS | +10.44%+10.64% | +11.37%+12.00% | n/a+14.55% | n/a+16.59% |
| Max drawdown | BGDV RECS | -1.73%-3.45% | -8.47%-8.79% | n/a-18.49% | n/a-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | BGDV RECS | 8d34d | 46d66d | n/a126d | n/a573d |
Trading data
BGDV | RECS | |
Last sale 7/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.85 | $44.03 |
| Previous close 07/20/2026 | $30.95 | $44.23 |
| Consolidated volume 07/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BGDV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBGDV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BGDV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.85 | $44.03 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $801.46 M | $5.90 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
BGDV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Bahl & Gaynor | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 867 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2024 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BGDV
USA
91.08%
Other
8.92%
RECS
USA
97.35%
Other
2.65%
Sectors
BGDV
Technology
32.54%
Finance
18.25%
Healthcare
10.74%
Industrials
10.06%
Other
28.41%
RECS
Technology
41.56%
Finance
14.34%
Healthcare
8.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.59%
Other
28.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
BGDV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.06%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.25%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
BGDV
Broadcom Inc.
6.07%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.23%
Western Digital Corp.
4.25%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.10%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.08%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
3.10%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
2.95%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
2.89%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
2.82%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.67%
Targa Resources Corp.
2.55%
Amphenol Corp.
2.50%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.29%
Cintas Corp.
2.28%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
2.28%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
9.53%
Apple, Inc.
9.07%
Microsoft Corp.
4.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.29%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.67%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.18%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.91%
Wells Fargo & Co.
1.66%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.65%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.62%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.60%
Morgan Stanley
1.59%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.46%
Lam Research Corp.
1.13%
Pfizer Inc.
1.07%
Frequently asked questions about BGDV and RECS
How have the BGDV and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 20, 2026, BGDV is up 13.14% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 8.35%. That puts BGDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BGDV or RECS?
Year-to-date, the BGDV ETF saw -$506K in flows, compared to +$679M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: BGDV or RECS?
Over the past year, BGDV had a volatility of 11.37%, while RECS experienced 12%.
Which ETF is bigger: BGDV or RECS?
As of July 20, 2026, BGDV holds $801.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $5.90 B.
What sectors do the BGDV and RECS ETFs invest in?
BGDV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the BGDV ETF and RECS ETF?
BGDV top holdings include Broadcom Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Western Digital Corp.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: BGDV or RECS?
BGDV holds 52 securities with 50.06% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 876 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.25%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
