Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BFRZvsCATHETF Comparison
Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BFRZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.29% for CATH. BFRZ is down -0.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$39M in YTD flows. CATH performs worse with -2.87% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BFRZ and CATH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BFRZ vs CATH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BFRZ CATH | -0.44%-2.38% | -0.30%-2.71% | -0.41%-2.87% | n/a+20.02% | n/a+75.13% | n/a+72.38% |
| Flows | BFRZ CATH | +$5M+$20M | +$39M+$39M | +$39M+$33M | -+$94M | -+$80M | -+$207M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BFRZ CATH | +5.65%+12.09% | n/a+18.63% | n/a+15.13% | n/a+17.49% |
| Max drawdown | BFRZ CATH | -1.40%-4.69% | n/a-13.72% | n/a-19.35% | n/a-26.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | BFRZ CATH | 24d59d | n/a45d | n/a126d | n/a713d |
BFRZ | CATH | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.64 | $79.38 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.71 | $79.87 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BFRZ | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BFRZ | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.64 | $79.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $116.01 M | $1.10 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.29% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BFRZ and CATH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, BFRZ is down -0.41% year-to-date (YTD), while CATH has lost -2.87%. That puts BFRZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BFRZ or CATH?
Year-to-date, the BFRZ ETF saw +$39M in flows, compared to +$33M for CATH.
Which ETF is bigger: BFRZ or CATH?
As of March 12, 2026, BFRZ holds $116.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while CATH manages $1.10 B.
What sectors do the BFRZ and CATH ETFs invest in?
BFRZ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, CATH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BFRZ ETF and CATH ETF?
BFRZ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. CATH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BFRZ or CATH?
BFRZ holds 183 securities with 44.95% of its assets in the top 15. CATH has 444 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.74%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
