Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BDVLvsACWVETF Comparison
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) belongs to the Alternatives segment. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. BDVL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, ACWV's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. BDVL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.41%, versus 0.2% for ACWV. BDVL is up 0.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$30M in YTD flows. ACWV performs better with 1.67% YTD performance, and +$49M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BDVL and ACWV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BDVL vs ACWV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BDVL ACWV | -2.73%-2.44% | +0.35%+1.46% | +0.22%+1.67% | n/a+8.46% | n/a+39.12% | n/a+37.89% |
| Flows | BDVL ACWV | -$49M+$13M | +$72M+$37M | +$30M+$49M | --$115M | --$1.94B | --$2.66B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BDVL ACWV | +8.32%+6.06% | n/a+9.62% | n/a+8.11% | n/a+9.60% |
| Max drawdown | BDVL ACWV | -4.90%-3.65% | n/a-7.33% | n/a-7.33% | n/a-18.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | BDVL ACWV | 12d12d | n/a27d | n/a27d | n/a784d |
BDVL | ACWV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.80 | $120.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $24.97 | $120.74 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BDVL | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BDVL | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.80 | $120.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.68% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $3.40 B |
| E/R | 0.41% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BDVL and ACWV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BDVL is up 0.22% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWV has returned 1.67%. That puts ACWV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BDVL or ACWV?
Year-to-date, the BDVL ETF saw +$30M in flows, compared to +$49M for ACWV.
Which ETF is bigger: BDVL or ACWV?
As of March 13, 2026, BDVL holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACWV manages $3.40 B.
What sectors do the BDVL and ACWV ETFs invest in?
BDVL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, ACWV focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the BDVL ETF and ACWV ETF?
BDVL top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, MICROSOFT-T and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. ACWV holds in its top three: JOHNSON&JOHNSON, CISCO-T and AMERISOURCEBERGEN.
Which ETF is more diversified: BDVL or ACWV?
BDVL holds 648 securities with 17.77% of its assets in the top 15. ACWV has 376 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.13%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
