BDGSvsDFAUETF Comparison
VS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) belong to the same industry segment: US All Cap. In contrast, DFAU's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. BDGS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.87%, versus 0.12% for DFAU. BDGS is up 5.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. DFAU performs better with 14.38% YTD performance, and +$1.32B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BDGS and DFAU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BDGS vs DFAU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BDGS DFAU | -3.63%+1.29% | +1.67%+5.16% | +5.52%+14.38% | +5.37%+14.31% | +52.57%+89.98% | n/a+75.42% |
| Flows | BDGS DFAU | +$1M+$135M | -$741K+$344M | -$5M+$1.32B | -$699K+$1.60B | +$14M+$4.76B | -+$7.44B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BDGS DFAU | +9.72%+10.49% | +8.21%+12.68% | +8.61%+15.12% | n/a+17.44% |
| Max drawdown | BDGS DFAU | -4.62%-3.39% | -4.76%-8.70% | -9.07%-19.41% | n/a-23.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | BDGS DFAU | 24d77d | 64d63d | 109d127d | n/a707d |
Trading data
BDGS | DFAU | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.58 | $52.26 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $37.43 | $53.17 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BDGS | DFAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.58 | $52.26 |
| 1D performance | -2.27% | -1.71% |
| AuM | $42.08 M | $13.10 B |
| E/R | 0.87% | 0.12% |
Characteristics
BDGS | DFAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Bridges Capital | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | 2181 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 11, 2023 | November 17, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BDGS
Data will be available soon
DFAU
USA
96.98%
Other
3.02%
Sectors
BDGS
Data will be available soon
DFAU
Technology
43.44%
Finance
12.62%
Healthcare
9.29%
Industrials
8.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.46%
Other
17.72%
Diversification
BDGS
Data will be available soon
DFAU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.54%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BDGS
Data will be available soon
DFAU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.37%
Apple, Inc.
6.88%
Microsoft Corp.
5.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.16%
Broadcom Inc.
2.12%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.11%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.76%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.24%
Tesla, Inc.
1.21%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.19%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.10%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.07%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.91%
Frequently asked questions about BDGS and DFAU
How have the BDGS and DFAU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, BDGS is up 5.52% year-to-date (YTD), while DFAU has returned 14.38%. That puts DFAU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BDGS or DFAU?
Year-to-date, the BDGS ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to +$1.32B for DFAU.
Which ETF is more volatile: BDGS or DFAU?
Over the past year, BDGS had a volatility of 8.21%, while DFAU experienced 12.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: BDGS or DFAU?
As of October 30, 2026, BDGS holds $42.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while DFAU manages $13.10 B.
Latest news about BDGS & DFAU
Advertisement
Advertisement
