BCUSvsRPGETF Comparison
VS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco S&P 500® Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. BCUS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, RPG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services. BCUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.35% for RPG. BCUS is up 12.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$50M in YTD flows. RPG performs better with 25.87% YTD performance, and +$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCUS and RPG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCUS vs RPG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCUS RPG | -0.44%-2.97% | +4.24%+4.64% | +12.82%+25.87% | +16.38%+25.94% | n/a+89.94% | n/a+53.01% |
| Flows | BCUS RPG | -$14M-$97M | +$34M+$7M | +$50M+$68M | +$58M-$102M | --$897M | --$1.39B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCUS RPG | +21.17%+35.72% | +16.01%+25.19% | n/a+23.36% | n/a+24.50% |
| Max drawdown | BCUS RPG | -8.30%-16.96% | -8.99%-16.96% | n/a-24.81% | n/a-35.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCUS RPG | 44d36d | 41d36d | n/a127d | n/a1100d |
Trading data
BCUS | RPG | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 7:40 PM | $36.42 | $58.24 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $36.39 | $58.71 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCUS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCUS | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/5/2026 at 7:40 PM
Live
Closed
BCUS | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.42 | $58.24 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | -0.80% |
| AuM | $158.49 M | $2.05 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
BCUS | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 65 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2023 | March 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCUS
USA
96.25%
Other
3.75%
RPG
USA
98.64%
Other
1.36%
Sectors
BCUS
Technology
30.18%
Industrials
21.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.14%
Utilities
7.3%
Energy
7.3%
Other
22.99%
RPG
Technology
46.85%
Industrials
17.84%
Consumer Services
10.07%
Other
25.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
BCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.48%
RPG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.96%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
BCUS
Carpenter Technology Corp.
4.87%
NRG Energy, Inc.
4.34%
InterDigital, Inc.
4.22%
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
3.88%
TechnipFMC plc
3.73%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.63%
Archrock, Inc.
3.57%
Spotify Technology SA
3.48%
Amphenol Corp.
3.48%
Hawkins, Inc.
3.46%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.44%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
3.43%
Brinker International, Inc.
3.42%
GE Aerospace
3.33%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.21%
RPG
Sandisk Corp.
9.96%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.29%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.27%
KLA Corp.
2.64%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.48%
Ciena Corp.
2.37%
Lam Research Corp.
2.17%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
2.10%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
2.05%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.04%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
2.00%
Amphenol Corp.
1.97%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
1.97%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
1.91%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.74%
Frequently asked questions about BCUS and RPG
How have the BCUS and RPG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, BCUS is up 12.82% year-to-date (YTD), while RPG has returned 25.87%. That puts RPG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCUS or RPG?
Year-to-date, the BCUS ETF saw +$50M in flows, compared to +$68M for RPG.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCUS or RPG?
Over the past year, BCUS had a volatility of 16.01%, while RPG experienced 25.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCUS or RPG?
As of August 5, 2026, BCUS holds $158.49 M in assets under management (AUM), while RPG manages $2.05 B.
What sectors do the BCUS and RPG ETFs invest in?
BCUS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, RPG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the BCUS ETF and RPG ETF?
BCUS top holdings include Carpenter Technology Corp., NRG Energy, Inc. and InterDigital, Inc.. RPG holds in its top three: Sandisk Corp., Micron Technology, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BCUS or RPG?
BCUS holds 30 securities with 55.48% of its assets in the top 15. RPG has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.96%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
