BCUSvsQGROETF Comparison
VS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BCUS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, QGRO's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. BCUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.29% for QGRO. BCUS is up 0.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$51M in YTD flows. QGRO performs better with 1.89% YTD performance, and -$418M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCUS and QGRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCUS vs QGRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCUS QGRO | -6.87%-1.84% | -11.25%-2.16% | +0.16%+1.89% | +1.36%+2.23% | n/a+72.78% | n/a+51.55% |
| Flows | BCUS QGRO | -$325K-$82M | +$4M-$125M | +$51M-$418M | +$51M-$278M | -+$622M | -+$1.05B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCUS QGRO | +18.59%+12.45% | +18.08%+16.17% | n/a+18.24% | n/a+21.26% |
| Max drawdown | BCUS QGRO | -14.52%-5.03% | -15.04%-13.53% | n/a-23.75% | n/a-31.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCUS QGRO | 79d83d | 135d142d | n/a156d | n/a794d |
Trading data
BCUS | QGRO | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $30.99 | $109.90 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $32.28 | $116.49 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCUS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCUS | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCUS | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.99 | $109.90 |
| 1D performance | -4.00% | -5.66% |
| AuM | $141.67 M | $1.86 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
BCUS | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | - | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 188 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2023 | January 11, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCUS
USA
91.65%
Other
8.35%
QGRO
USA
95.74%
Other
4.26%
Sectors
BCUS
Technology
30.66%
Industrials
16.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.59%
Finance
11.36%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.1%
Other
17.36%
QGRO
Technology
49.64%
Healthcare
13.43%
Industrials
10.78%
Finance
7.14%
Other
19.01%
Diversification
BCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.89%
QGRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
BCUS
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.84%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.57%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.54%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.28%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
4.03%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
4.00%
Broadcom Inc.
3.97%
InterDigital, Inc.
3.81%
Millicom International Cellular SA
3.68%
Applovin Corp.
3.66%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
3.19%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
3.09%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
3.08%
Amphenol Corp.
3.08%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
3.07%
QGRO
Apple, Inc.
3.72%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.30%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.20%
Microsoft Corp.
3.14%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.85%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.83%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.70%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
2.66%
Amphenol Corp.
2.53%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.34%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
2.30%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
2.28%
Lockheed Martin Corp.
2.15%
Western Digital Corp.
2.09%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
1.86%
Frequently asked questions about BCUS and QGRO
How have the BCUS and QGRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, BCUS is up 0.16% year-to-date (YTD), while QGRO has returned 1.89%. That puts QGRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCUS or QGRO?
Year-to-date, the BCUS ETF saw +$51M in flows, compared to -$418M for QGRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCUS or QGRO?
Over the past year, BCUS had a volatility of 18.08%, while QGRO experienced 16.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCUS or QGRO?
As of November 4, 2026, BCUS holds $141.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while QGRO manages $1.86 B.
What sectors do the BCUS and QGRO ETFs invest in?
BCUS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, QGRO focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BCUS ETF and QGRO ETF?
BCUS top holdings include Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings Plc. QGRO holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and Mastercard, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BCUS or QGRO?
BCUS holds 30 securities with 56.89% of its assets in the top 15. QGRO has 188 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.95%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
