BCUSvsIWPETF Comparison
VS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. BCUS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, IWP's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. BCUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.23% for IWP. BCUS is up 11.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$50M in YTD flows. IWP performs worse with 2.92% YTD performance, and -$839M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCUS and IWP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCUS vs IWP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/06/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCUS IWP | -1.86%-2.49% | +0.06%+1.33% | +11.20%+2.92% | +13.91%+0.02% | n/a+47.04% | n/a+25.29% |
| Flows | BCUS IWP | -$14M-$404M | +$50M+$24M | +$50M-$839M | +$58M+$115M | -+$1.28B | -+$854M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCUS IWP | +20.71%+18.71% | +16.06%+17.81% | n/a+19.76% | n/a+22.58% |
| Max drawdown | BCUS IWP | -8.30%-8.32% | -8.99%-14.82% | n/a-25.34% | n/a-38.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCUS IWP | 45d37d | 41d245d | n/a134d | n/a1059d |
Trading data
BCUS | IWP | |
Last sale 8/7/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.97 | $144.04 |
| Previous close 08/06/2026 | $35.86 | $140.66 |
| Consolidated volume 08/06/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCUS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/7/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.97 | $144.04 |
| 1D performance | +0.30% | +2.40% |
| AuM | $156.22 M | $20.20 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.23% |
Characteristics
BCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Midcap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 266 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2023 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCUS
USA
96.25%
Other
3.75%
IWP
USA
96.58%
Other
3.42%
Sectors
BCUS
Technology
30.18%
Industrials
21.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.14%
Utilities
7.3%
Energy
7.3%
Other
22.99%
IWP
Technology
33.56%
Industrials
19.09%
Healthcare
12.67%
Consumer Services
9.55%
Finance
8.03%
Other
17.09%
Diversification
BCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.48%
IWP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.82%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
BCUS
Carpenter Technology Corp.
4.87%
NRG Energy, Inc.
4.34%
InterDigital, Inc.
4.22%
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
3.88%
TechnipFMC plc
3.73%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.63%
Archrock, Inc.
3.57%
Spotify Technology SA
3.48%
Amphenol Corp.
3.48%
Hawkins, Inc.
3.46%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.44%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
3.43%
Brinker International, Inc.
3.42%
GE Aerospace
3.33%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.21%
IWP
Datadog, Inc.
2.34%
Snowflake, Inc.
2.33%
Cloudflare, Inc.
2.12%
Teradyne, Inc.
2.07%
Astera Labs, Inc.
2.02%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
1.96%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
1.89%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
1.75%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.67%
Targa Resources Corp.
1.56%
Rocket Lab Corp.
1.49%
Vistra Corp.
1.46%
Cencora, Inc.
1.45%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.39%
Microchip Technology, Inc.
1.33%
Frequently asked questions about BCUS and IWP
How have the BCUS and IWP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 6, 2026, BCUS is up 11.2% year-to-date (YTD), while IWP has returned 2.92%. That puts BCUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCUS or IWP?
Year-to-date, the BCUS ETF saw +$50M in flows, compared to -$839M for IWP.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCUS or IWP?
Over the past year, BCUS had a volatility of 16.06%, while IWP experienced 17.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCUS or IWP?
As of August 6, 2026, BCUS holds $156.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWP manages $20.20 B.
What sectors do the BCUS and IWP ETFs invest in?
BCUS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, IWP focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the BCUS ETF and IWP ETF?
BCUS top holdings include Carpenter Technology Corp., NRG Energy, Inc. and InterDigital, Inc.. IWP holds in its top three: Datadog, Inc., Snowflake, Inc. and Cloudflare, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BCUS or IWP?
BCUS holds 30 securities with 55.48% of its assets in the top 15. IWP has 267 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.82%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
