BCUSvsGLRYETF Comparison
VS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BCUS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, GLRY's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. BCUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.87% for GLRY. BCUS is up 0.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$51M in YTD flows. GLRY performs better with 2.19% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCUS and GLRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCUS vs GLRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCUS GLRY | -6.87%-5.87% | -11.25%-13.26% | +0.16%+2.19% | +1.36%+0.66% | n/a+48.84% | n/a+22.34% |
| Flows | BCUS GLRY | -$325K-$133K | +$4M+$7M | +$51M+$38M | +$51M+$54M | -+$87M | -+$90M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCUS GLRY | +18.59%+15.37% | +18.08%+20.70% | n/a+18.84% | n/a+20.15% |
| Max drawdown | BCUS GLRY | -14.52%-14.48% | -15.04%-17.77% | n/a-20.66% | n/a-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCUS GLRY | 79d92d | 135d127d | n/a209d | n/a917d |
Trading data
BCUS | GLRY | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $30.99 | $35.33 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $32.28 | $36.39 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCUS | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.99 | $35.33 |
| 1D performance | -4.00% | -2.92% |
| AuM | $141.67 M | $154.79 M |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.87% |
Characteristics
BCUS | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 33 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2023 | August 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCUS
USA
91.65%
Other
8.35%
GLRY
USA
99.82%
Other
0.18%
Sectors
BCUS
Technology
30.66%
Industrials
16.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.59%
Finance
11.36%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.1%
Other
17.36%
GLRY
Technology
31.12%
Industrials
18.37%
Finance
17.23%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.8%
Healthcare
9.42%
Other
14.06%
Advertisement
Diversification
BCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.89%
GLRY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
BCUS
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.84%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.57%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.54%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.28%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
4.03%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
4.00%
Broadcom Inc.
3.97%
InterDigital, Inc.
3.81%
Millicom International Cellular SA
3.68%
Applovin Corp.
3.66%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
3.19%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
3.09%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
3.08%
Amphenol Corp.
3.08%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
3.07%
GLRY
KLA Corp.
6.57%
Amphenol Corp.
5.76%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
5.25%
Broadcom Inc.
4.77%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
4.69%
United Therapeutics Corp.
4.05%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.95%
Flowserve Corp.
3.42%
ACM Research, Inc.
3.42%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
3.27%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.16%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.14%
Photronics, Inc.
2.89%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
2.85%
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
2.82%
Frequently asked questions about BCUS and GLRY
How have the BCUS and GLRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, BCUS is up 0.16% year-to-date (YTD), while GLRY has returned 2.19%. That puts GLRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCUS or GLRY?
Year-to-date, the BCUS ETF saw +$51M in flows, compared to +$38M for GLRY.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCUS or GLRY?
Over the past year, BCUS had a volatility of 18.08%, while GLRY experienced 20.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCUS or GLRY?
As of November 4, 2026, BCUS holds $141.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLRY manages $154.79 M.
What sectors do the BCUS and GLRY ETFs invest in?
BCUS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, GLRY focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the BCUS ETF and GLRY ETF?
BCUS top holdings include Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings Plc. GLRY holds in its top three: KLA Corp., Amphenol Corp. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BCUS or GLRY?
BCUS holds 30 securities with 56.89% of its assets in the top 15. GLRY has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.03%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
