BCUSvsFTGSETF Comparison
VS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. BCUS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FTGS's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. BCUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.6% for FTGS. BCUS is down -3.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$51M in YTD flows. FTGS performs better with 4.11% YTD performance, and -$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCUS and FTGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCUS vs FTGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCUS FTGS | -10.71%-4.44% | -14.88%-6.95% | -3.97%+4.11% | -3.45%+4.44% | n/a+53.66% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BCUS FTGS | -$325K+$2M | +$4M-$6M | +$51M-$68M | +$51M-$59M | -+$993M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCUS FTGS | +20.12%+14.44% | +18.53%+14.27% | n/a+16.63% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BCUS FTGS | -16.67%-8.06% | -17.18%-9.38% | n/a-20.04% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BCUS FTGS | 80d87d | 136d80d | n/a112d | n/an/a |
Trading data
BCUS | FTGS | |
Last sale 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM | $31.57 | $36.82 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $30.99 | $36.76 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCUS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCUS | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCUS | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.57 | $36.82 |
| 1D performance | +1.87% | +0.17% |
| AuM | $135.83 M | $1.24 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
BCUS | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | The Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2023 | October 26, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCUS
USA
91.65%
Other
8.36%
FTGS
USA
91.53%
Other
8.47%
Sectors
BCUS
Technology
30.66%
Industrials
16.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.59%
Finance
11.36%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.1%
Other
17.36%
FTGS
Technology
35.88%
Healthcare
15.9%
Industrials
12.9%
Finance
9.56%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.76%
Other
18%
Diversification
BCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.89%
FTGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.28%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
BCUS
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.84%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.57%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.54%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.28%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
4.03%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
4.00%
Broadcom Inc.
3.97%
InterDigital, Inc.
3.81%
Millicom International Cellular SA
3.68%
Applovin Corp.
3.66%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
3.19%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
3.09%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
3.08%
Amphenol Corp.
3.08%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
3.07%
FTGS
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
2.81%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.78%
Microsoft Corp.
2.55%
Newmont Corp.
2.51%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.38%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
2.35%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
2.28%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.23%
Garmin Ltd.
2.22%
Amphenol Corp.
2.22%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.20%
Target Corp.
2.20%
DexCom, Inc.
2.20%
ResMed, Inc.
2.18%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.17%
Frequently asked questions about BCUS and FTGS
How have the BCUS and FTGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 5, 2026, BCUS is down -3.97% year-to-date (YTD), while FTGS has returned 4.11%. That puts FTGS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCUS or FTGS?
Year-to-date, the BCUS ETF saw +$51M in flows, compared to -$68M for FTGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCUS or FTGS?
Over the past year, BCUS had a volatility of 18.53%, while FTGS experienced 14.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCUS or FTGS?
As of November 5, 2026, BCUS holds $135.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTGS manages $1.24 B.
What sectors do the BCUS and FTGS ETFs invest in?
BCUS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FTGS focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BCUS ETF and FTGS ETF?
BCUS top holdings include Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings Plc. FTGS holds in its top three: Palantir Technologies, Inc., Marvell Technology, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: BCUS or FTGS?
BCUS holds 30 securities with 56.89% of its assets in the top 15. FTGS has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.28%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
