BCUSvsFPXETF Comparison
VS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. BCUS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FPX's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. BCUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.61% for FPX. BCUS is up 0.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$51M in YTD flows. FPX performs better with 2.5% YTD performance, and +$125M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCUS and FPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCUS vs FPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCUS FPX | -6.87%-8.08% | -11.25%-9.24% | +0.16%+2.50% | +1.36%+3.15% | n/a+107.66% | n/a+28.28% |
| Flows | BCUS FPX | -$325K-$27M | +$4M-$36M | +$51M+$125M | +$51M+$158M | -+$100M | --$619M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCUS FPX | +18.59%+21.05% | +18.08%+26.59% | n/a+26.83% | n/a+27.32% |
| Max drawdown | BCUS FPX | -14.52%-13.70% | -15.04%-18.98% | n/a-30.75% | n/a-43.15% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCUS FPX | 79d79d | 135d127d | n/a125d | n/a1183d |
Trading data
BCUS | FPX | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $30.99 | $157.58 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $32.28 | $167.86 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCUS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCUS | FPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCUS | FPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.99 | $157.58 |
| 1D performance | -4.00% | -6.12% |
| AuM | $141.67 M | $1.34 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.61% |
Characteristics
BCUS | FPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | IPOX U.S. 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 100 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2023 | April 12, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCUS
USA
91.65%
Other
8.35%
FPX
USA
90.59%
Other
9.41%
Sectors
BCUS
Technology
30.66%
Industrials
16.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.59%
Finance
11.36%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.1%
Other
17.36%
FPX
Technology
27.63%
Healthcare
20.83%
Finance
14.57%
Industrials
11.01%
Telecommunication.
7.8%
Other
18.16%
Advertisement
Diversification
BCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.89%
FPX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.08%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
BCUS
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.84%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.57%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.54%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.28%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
4.03%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
4.00%
Broadcom Inc.
3.97%
InterDigital, Inc.
3.81%
Millicom International Cellular SA
3.68%
Applovin Corp.
3.66%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
3.19%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
3.09%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
3.08%
Amphenol Corp.
3.08%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
3.07%
FPX
GE Vernova, Inc.
7.76%
Sandisk Corp.
7.15%
Eli Lilly & Co.
7.10%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
6.15%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
5.64%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
3.07%
HF Sinclair Corp.
3.06%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
3.06%
Twilio, Inc.
2.27%
Corpay, Inc.
1.96%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.78%
Unity Software, Inc.
1.57%
DoorDash, Inc.
1.55%
Applovin Corp.
1.54%
Dave, Inc.
1.42%
Frequently asked questions about BCUS and FPX
How have the BCUS and FPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, BCUS is up 0.16% year-to-date (YTD), while FPX has returned 2.5%. That puts FPX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCUS or FPX?
Year-to-date, the BCUS ETF saw +$51M in flows, compared to +$125M for FPX.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCUS or FPX?
Over the past year, BCUS had a volatility of 18.08%, while FPX experienced 26.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCUS or FPX?
As of November 4, 2026, BCUS holds $141.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while FPX manages $1.34 B.
What sectors do the BCUS and FPX ETFs invest in?
BCUS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FPX focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the BCUS ETF and FPX ETF?
BCUS top holdings include Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings Plc. FPX holds in its top three: GE Vernova, Inc., Sandisk Corp. and Eli Lilly & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: BCUS or FPX?
BCUS holds 30 securities with 56.89% of its assets in the top 15. FPX has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.08%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
