BCILvsEFGETF Comparison
VS
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. BCIL's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, EFG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Finance. BCIL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.34% for EFG. BCIL is up 1.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. EFG performs better with 4.1% YTD performance, and +$4.98B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCIL and EFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCIL vs EFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCIL EFG | -3.28%-2.48% | -3.28%-1.35% | +1.32%+4.10% | -2.51%+3.13% | n/a+48.46% | n/a+16.45% |
| Flows | BCIL EFG | --$1.15B | +$125K-$1.30B | +$13M+$4.98B | +$41M+$4.84B | --$26M | -+$1.36B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCIL EFG | +14.65%+14.66% | +17.40%+19.01% | n/a+17.16% | n/a+18.32% |
| Max drawdown | BCIL EFG | -8.87%-7.25% | -12.46%-12.79% | n/a-16.80% | n/a-35.34% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCIL EFG | 67d71d | 184d92d | n/a232d | n/a1052d |
Trading data
BCIL | EFG | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.00 | $117.75 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $28.14 | $118.46 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BCIL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCIL | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCIL | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.00 | $117.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.60% |
| AuM | $87.95 M | $14.82 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
BCIL | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 345 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 21, 2024 | August 1, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCIL
Japan
16.58%
Republic of Korea
14.61%
United Kingdom
10.25%
Germany
10.04%
Switzerland
8.65%
Israel
7.13%
Other
32.74%
EFG
Japan
23.73%
United Kingdom
11.31%
Switzerland
10.37%
Netherlands
10.14%
Germany
8.93%
France
7.75%
Other
27.77%
Sectors
BCIL
Industrials
21.93%
Technology
21.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
16.28%
Finance
12.18%
Other
27.87%
EFG
Industrials
25.02%
Technology
23.06%
Finance
12.22%
Healthcare
12.21%
Other
27.48%
Advertisement
Diversification
BCIL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.78%
EFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.58%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
BCIL
SAMYANG FOODS Co., Ltd.
4.51%
Heidelberg Materials AG
4.17%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
4.10%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.03%
UCB SA
3.97%
Codan Ltd.
3.91%
Benefit Systems SA
3.90%
Advantest Corp.
3.83%
Next Vision Stabilized Systems Ltd.
3.82%
ASICS Corp.
3.68%
Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd.
3.31%
HD Hyundai Electric Co., Ltd.
3.23%
Zegona Communications Plc
3.12%
Fujikura Ltd.
3.11%
Unipol Assicurazioni SpA
3.09%
EFG
ASML Holding NV
5.94%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.23%
SAP SE
2.04%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.74%
Schneider Electric SE
1.71%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.57%
UBS Group AG
1.55%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.43%
Advantest Corp.
1.40%
ABB Ltd.
1.37%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.37%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.37%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.33%
Sony Group Corp.
1.33%
Airbus SE
1.23%
Frequently asked questions about BCIL and EFG
How have the BCIL and EFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, BCIL is up 1.32% year-to-date (YTD), while EFG has returned 4.1%. That puts EFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCIL or EFG?
Year-to-date, the BCIL ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to +$4.98B for EFG.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCIL or EFG?
Over the past year, BCIL had a volatility of 17.4%, while EFG experienced 19.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCIL or EFG?
As of October 23, 2026, BCIL holds $87.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFG manages $14.82 B.
What sectors do the BCIL and EFG ETFs invest in?
BCIL leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, EFG focuses on Industrials, Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the BCIL ETF and EFG ETF?
BCIL top holdings include SAMYANG FOODS Co., Ltd., Heidelberg Materials AG and Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc. EFG holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, AstraZeneca PLC and SAP SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: BCIL or EFG?
BCIL holds 30 securities with 55.78% of its assets in the top 15. EFG has 350 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.58%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BCIL & EFG
Advertisement
Advertisement
