BCIvsFTGCETF Comparison
ETF 1
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
-0.09%
VS
ETF 2
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
-0.09%
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF (FTGC) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. BCI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.98% for FTGC. BCI is up 35.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.02B in YTD flows. FTGC performs better with 37.47% YTD performance, and +$918M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCI and FTGC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCI vs FTGC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCI FTGC | -1.03%-0.63% | +12.26%+9.75% | +35.09%+37.47% | +40.19%+42.61% | +55.68%+60.67% | +64.44%+83.29% |
| Flows | BCI FTGC | +$32M+$92M | +$742M+$269M | +$1.02B+$918M | +$1.20B+$824M | +$2.10B+$140M | +$2.37B+$1.14B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCI FTGC | +13.44%+11.17% | +18.15%+15.81% | +14.52%+13.58% | +16.51%+15.06% |
| Max drawdown | BCI FTGC | -5.32%-3.97% | -14.33%-12.01% | -14.33%-12.01% | -26.07%-20.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCI FTGC | 22d19d | 105d98d | 105d98d | 1323d1324d |
Trading data
BCI | FTGC | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.26 | $30.98 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $26.34 | $31.11 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTGC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCI | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCI | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.26 | $30.98 |
| 1D performance | -0.32% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $3.55 B | $3.44 B |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.98% |
Characteristics
BCI | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | abrdn | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Commodity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 30, 2017 | October 23, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCI
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BCI
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Diversification
BCI
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BCI
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BCI and FTGC
How have the BCI and FTGC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BCI is up 35.09% year-to-date (YTD), while FTGC has returned 37.47%. That puts FTGC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCI or FTGC?
Year-to-date, the BCI ETF saw +$1.02B in flows, compared to +$918M for FTGC.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCI or FTGC?
Over the past year, BCI had a volatility of 18.15%, while FTGC experienced 15.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCI or FTGC?
As of October 16, 2026, BCI holds $3.55 B in assets under management (AUM), while FTGC manages $3.44 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
