BCIvsCMDTETF Comparison
ETF 1
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.77%
VS
ETF 2
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.77%
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. BCI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.98% for CMDT. BCI is up 34.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.02B in YTD flows. CMDT performs worse with 31.34% YTD performance, and +$136M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCI and CMDT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCI vs CMDT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCI CMDT | -1.88%+0.61% | +11.07%+11.41% | +34.58%+31.34% | +40.56%+32.24% | +55.09%+51.87% | +62.07%n/a |
| Flows | BCI CMDT | +$51M+$33M | +$741M+$54M | +$1.02B+$136M | +$1.19B+$155M | +$2.10B+$520M | +$2.37B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCI CMDT | +13.54%+11.34% | +18.16%+13.57% | +14.53%+12.18% | +16.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BCI CMDT | -5.32%-3.50% | -14.33%-13.01% | -14.33%-13.01% | -26.07%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BCI CMDT | 22d36d | 105d105d | 105d105d | 1323dn/a |
Trading data
BCI | CMDT | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.34 | $32.33 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $26.42 | $32.25 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CMDT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCI | CMDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCI | CMDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.34 | $32.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $3.53 B | $847.44 M |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.98% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCI
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BCI
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
BCI
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BCI
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BCI and CMDT
How have the BCI and CMDT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, BCI is up 34.58% year-to-date (YTD), while CMDT has returned 31.34%. That puts BCI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCI or CMDT?
Year-to-date, the BCI ETF saw +$1.02B in flows, compared to +$136M for CMDT.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCI or CMDT?
Over the past year, BCI had a volatility of 18.16%, while CMDT experienced 13.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCI or CMDT?
As of October 15, 2026, BCI holds $3.53 B in assets under management (AUM), while CMDT manages $847.44 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
