BCDvsFTGCETF Comparison
ETF 1
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.77%
VS
ETF 2
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.77%
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF (FTGC) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. BCD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.98% for FTGC. BCD is up 26.33% year-to-date (YTD) with +$69M in YTD flows. FTGC performs better with 37.47% YTD performance, and +$918M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCD and FTGC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCD vs FTGC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCD FTGC | -0.57%-0.63% | +8.97%+9.75% | +26.33%+37.47% | +31.26%+42.61% | +49.03%+60.67% | +65.20%+83.29% |
| Flows | BCD FTGC | +$18K+$92M | +$9M+$269M | +$69M+$918M | +$86M+$824M | +$128M+$140M | +$356M+$1.14B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCD FTGC | +10.25%+11.17% | +14.45%+15.81% | +12.52%+13.58% | +14.84%+15.06% |
| Max drawdown | BCD FTGC | -3.24%-3.97% | -12.12%-12.01% | -12.12%-12.01% | -22.53%-20.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | BCD FTGC | 15d19d | 108d98d | 108d98d | 1294d1324d |
Trading data
BCD | FTGC | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.31 | $31.20 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $39.10 | $31.04 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTGC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCD | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BCD | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.31 | $31.20 |
| 1D performance | +0.54% | +0.52% |
| AuM | $445.58 M | $3.44 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.98% |
Characteristics
BCD | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | abrdn | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 30, 2017 | October 23, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCD
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BCD
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Diversification
BCD
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BCD
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BCD and FTGC
How have the BCD and FTGC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, BCD is up 26.33% year-to-date (YTD), while FTGC has returned 37.47%. That puts FTGC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCD or FTGC?
Year-to-date, the BCD ETF saw +$69M in flows, compared to +$918M for FTGC.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCD or FTGC?
Over the past year, BCD had a volatility of 14.45%, while FTGC experienced 15.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCD or FTGC?
As of October 15, 2026, BCD holds $445.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTGC manages $3.44 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
