BCDvsCMDTETF Comparison
ETF 1
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
-0.09%
VS
ETF 2
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
-0.09%
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. BCD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.98% for CMDT. BCD is up 26.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$69M in YTD flows. CMDT performs better with 30.78% YTD performance, and +$136M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BCD and CMDT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BCD vs CMDT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BCD CMDT | +0.21%+0.41% | +10.13%+9.68% | +26.86%+30.78% | +30.99%+31.07% | +49.66%+49.23% | +67.56%n/a |
| Flows | BCD CMDT | +$18K+$23M | +$9M+$52M | +$69M+$136M | +$93M+$155M | +$128M+$520M | +$356M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BCD CMDT | +10.14%+11.42% | +14.44%+13.54% | +12.51%+12.19% | +14.84%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BCD CMDT | -3.24%-3.50% | -12.12%-13.01% | -12.12%-13.01% | -22.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BCD CMDT | 15d39d | 108d105d | 108d105d | 1294dn/a |
Trading data
BCD | CMDT | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:36 PM | $39.17 | $32.31 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $39.24 | $32.25 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CMDT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBCD | CMDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:36 PM
Live
Closed
BCD | CMDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.17 | $32.31 |
| 1D performance | -0.18% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $447.46 M | $843.83 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.98% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BCD
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BCD
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
BCD
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BCD
Data will be available soon
CMDT
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BCD and CMDT
How have the BCD and CMDT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BCD is up 26.86% year-to-date (YTD), while CMDT has returned 30.78%. That puts CMDT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BCD or CMDT?
Year-to-date, the BCD ETF saw +$69M in flows, compared to +$136M for CMDT.
Which ETF is more volatile: BCD or CMDT?
Over the past year, BCD had a volatility of 14.44%, while CMDT experienced 13.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: BCD or CMDT?
As of October 16, 2026, BCD holds $447.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while CMDT manages $843.83 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
