BBUSvsZMARETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
ZMAR
Innovator Equity Defined Protection (1Y March) ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.04%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Innovator Equity Defined Protection (1Y March) ETF (ZMAR) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. BBUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.02%, versus 0.79% for ZMAR. BBUS is up 4.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$675M in YTD flows. ZMAR performs worse with 1.86% YTD performance, and +$39M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BBUS and ZMAR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BBUS vs ZMAR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BBUS ZMAR | +12.74%+2.07% | +2.80%+1.35% | +4.79%+1.86% | +30.77%+8.74% | +81.10%n/a | +79.44%n/a |
| Flows | BBUS ZMAR | +$123M+$29M | +$563M+$44M | +$675M+$39M | +$2.18B+$18M | +$4.11B- | +$5.18B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BBUS ZMAR | +15.30%+2.77% | +12.56%+2.24% | +15.06%n/a | +17.21%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BBUS ZMAR | -9.15%-1.24% | -9.15%-1.24% | -19.04%n/a | -25.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BBUS ZMAR | 77d38d | 77d38d | 126dn/a | 715dn/a |
Trading data
BBUS | ZMAR | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $128.30 | $27.98 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $128.91 | $27.97 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ZMAR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBBUS | ZMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BBUS | ZMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $128.30 | $27.98 |
| 1D performance | -0.47% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $7.78 B | $132.31 M |
| E/R | 0.02% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
BBUS | ZMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Innovator |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 461 | 478 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 2019 | March 3, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BBUS
USA
96.95%
Other
3.05%
ZMAR
USA
88.95%
Other
11.05%
Sectors
BBUS
Information Techn.
33.92%
Financials
10.34%
Communication Ser.
10.25%
Consumer Discreti.
9.97%
Health Care
9.41%
Industrials
8.37%
Other
17.74%
ZMAR
Information Techn.
31.17%
Financials
9.42%
Communication Ser.
9.41%
Consumer Discreti.
9.21%
Health Care
8.57%
Industrials
7.65%
Other
24.57%
Advertisement
Diversification
BBUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.95%
ZMAR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
BBUS
NVIDIA
7.20%
APPLE
6.69%
MICROSOFT-T
4.86%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.59%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.93%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.57%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.54%
META PLATFORMS
2.11%
TESLA
1.87%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.58%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.40%
EXXON
1.31%
LILLY
1.28%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.06%
WALMART INC
0.97%
ZMAR
NVIDIA
6.97%
APPLE
6.12%
MICROSOFT-T
4.52%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.34%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.75%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.41%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.20%
META PLATFORMS
2.06%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.23%
LILLY
1.20%
EXXON
1.17%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
0.97%
WALMART INC
0.90%
Frequently asked questions about BBUS and ZMAR
How have the BBUS and ZMAR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, BBUS is up 4.79% year-to-date (YTD), while ZMAR has returned 1.86%. That puts BBUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BBUS or ZMAR?
Year-to-date, the BBUS ETF saw +$675M in flows, compared to +$39M for ZMAR.
Which ETF is more volatile: BBUS or ZMAR?
Over the past year, BBUS had a volatility of 12.56%, while ZMAR experienced 2.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: BBUS or ZMAR?
As of April 27, 2026, BBUS holds $7.78 B in assets under management (AUM), while ZMAR manages $132.31 M.
What sectors do the BBUS and ZMAR ETFs invest in?
BBUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, ZMAR focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the BBUS ETF and ZMAR ETF?
BBUS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ZMAR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BBUS or ZMAR?
BBUS holds 492 securities with 41.95% of its assets in the top 15. ZMAR has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.99%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
