Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BBUSvsONOFETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BBUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.02%, versus 0.39% for ONOF. BBUS is down -1.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$474M in YTD flows. ONOF performs better with -1.03% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BBUS and ONOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BBUS vs ONOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BBUS ONOF | -2.26%-2.19% | -1.91%-1.88% | -1.11%-1.03% | +22.80%+13.72% | +83.34%+46.26% | +80.17%+54.21% |
| Flows | BBUS ONOF | +$62M+$3M | +$610M+$4M | +$474M+$2M | +$2.11B+$5M | +$4.09B+$39M | +$5.08B+$52M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BBUS ONOF | +11.60%+11.78% | +18.31%+17.22% | +14.94%+14.17% | +17.09%+14.45% |
| Max drawdown | BBUS ONOF | -3.50%-3.48% | -13.90%-13.77% | -19.04%-21.66% | -25.46%-25.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | BBUS ONOF | 43d58d | 45d89d | 126d205d | 715d756d |
BBUS | ONOF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $121.91 | $37.19 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $122.02 | $37.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BBUS | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BBUS | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.91 | $37.19 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $7.16 B | $142.50 M |
| E/R | 0.02% | 0.39% |
BBUS | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index |
| N° of holdings | 461 | 470 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 2019 | January 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BBUS and ONOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BBUS is down -1.11% year-to-date (YTD), while ONOF has lost -1.03%. That puts ONOF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BBUS or ONOF?
Year-to-date, the BBUS ETF saw +$474M in flows, compared to +$2M for ONOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: BBUS or ONOF?
Over the past year, BBUS had a volatility of 18.31%, while ONOF experienced 17.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: BBUS or ONOF?
As of March 11, 2026, BBUS holds $7.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while ONOF manages $142.50 M.
What sectors do the BBUS and ONOF ETFs invest in?
BBUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ONOF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BBUS ETF and ONOF ETF?
BBUS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ONOF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BBUS or ONOF?
BBUS holds 491 securities with 43.79% of its assets in the top 15. ONOF has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.08%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
