BBJPvsFLJHETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. BBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.09% for FLJH. BBJP is up 14.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.06B in YTD flows. FLJH performs better with 19.03% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BBJP and FLJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BBJP vs FLJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BBJP FLJH | -1.89%-4.31% | +4.46%+6.16% | +14.59%+19.03% | +27.74%+43.41% | +65.01%+109.27% | +53.87%+169.28% |
| Flows | BBJP FLJH | +$584M+$9M | +$988M+$27M | +$2.06B+$47M | +$2.05B+$54M | +$4.42B-$106M | +$4.99B+$120M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BBJP FLJH | +24.21%+22.45% | +21.93%+20.62% | +19.87%+21.48% | +18.79%+19.43% |
| Max drawdown | BBJP FLJH | -7.72%-5.44% | -13.59%-11.13% | -15.55%-25.01% | -32.66%-25.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | BBJP FLJH | 42d41d | 126d71d | 225d321d | 897d321d |
Trading data
BBJP | FLJH | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 4:15 PM | $76.08 | $44.53 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $74.98 | $44.02 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 4:15 PM
Live
Closed
BBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $76.08 | $44.53 |
| 1D performance | +1.46% | +1.16% |
| AuM | $18.19 B | $177.18 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
BBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 173 | 474 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 18, 2018 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BBJP
Japan
99.98%
Other
0.02%
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
BBJP
Technology
26.78%
Finance
19.28%
Industrials
18.54%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.75%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.18%
Other
18.47%
FLJH
Technology
24.81%
Finance
19.28%
Industrials
18.39%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.92%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.01%
Other
19.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
BBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.58%
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
BBJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.14%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
3.91%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.76%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.48%
Advantest Corp.
2.86%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.76%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.75%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
2.34%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.30%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.16%
Sony Group Corp.
2.13%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.82%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.79%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.77%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.63%
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.57%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.24%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
3.12%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.97%
Advantest Corp.
2.36%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.36%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.33%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.99%
Sony Group Corp.
1.91%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.89%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.85%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.54%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.50%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.46%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.41%
Frequently asked questions about BBJP and FLJH
How have the BBJP and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, BBJP is up 14.59% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 19.03%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BBJP or FLJH?
Year-to-date, the BBJP ETF saw +$2.06B in flows, compared to +$47M for FLJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: BBJP or FLJH?
Over the past year, BBJP had a volatility of 21.93%, while FLJH experienced 20.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: BBJP or FLJH?
As of August 3, 2026, BBJP holds $18.19 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $177.18 M.
What sectors do the BBJP and FLJH ETFs invest in?
BBJP leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BBJP ETF and FLJH ETF?
BBJP top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Kioxia Holdings Corp. and Tokyo Electron Ltd.. FLJH holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Tokyo Electron Ltd. and Kioxia Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: BBJP or FLJH?
BBJP holds 173 securities with 39.58% of its assets in the top 15. FLJH has 474 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.49%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BBJP & FLJH
Advertisement
