Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BBINvsFFDIETF Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. BBIN's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, FFDI's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. BBIN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 0.55% for FFDI. BBIN is up 3.49% year-to-date (YTD) with -$183M in YTD flows. FFDI performs worse with 0.46% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BBIN and FFDI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BBIN vs FFDI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BBIN FFDI | -5.70%-5.01% | +4.30%+1.62% | +3.49%+0.46% | +25.72%+17.97% | +61.52%n/a | +53.65%n/a |
| Flows | BBIN FFDI | -$46M+$3M | -$168M+$3M | -$183M+$3M | -$77M+$6M | +$1.13B- | +$1.28B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BBIN FFDI | +14.62%+15.34% | +16.25%+16.76% | +14.18%n/a | +15.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BBIN FFDI | -6.97%-7.71% | -13.68%-15.58% | -13.68%n/a | -29.29%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BBIN FFDI | 14d10d | 41d37d | 41dn/a | 877dn/a |
BBIN | FFDI | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 4:48 PM | $73.94 | $30.50 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $75.19 | $30.55 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BBIN | FFDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BBIN | FFDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.94 | $30.50 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $6.05 B | $18.21 M |
| E/R | 0.07% | 0.55% |
BBIN | FFDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | The Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 613 | 99 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2019 | November 19, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BBIN and FFDI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BBIN is up 3.49% year-to-date (YTD), while FFDI has returned 0.46%. That puts BBIN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BBIN or FFDI?
Year-to-date, the BBIN ETF saw -$183M in flows, compared to +$3M for FFDI.
Which ETF is more volatile: BBIN or FFDI?
Over the past year, BBIN had a volatility of 16.25%, while FFDI experienced 16.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: BBIN or FFDI?
As of March 11, 2026, BBIN holds $6.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while FFDI manages $18.21 M.
What sectors do the BBIN and FFDI ETFs invest in?
BBIN leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, FFDI focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the BBIN ETF and FFDI ETF?
BBIN top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. FFDI holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HITACHI and BANCO SANTANDER SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: BBIN or FFDI?
BBIN holds 649 securities with 18.45% of its assets in the top 15. FFDI has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.55%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
