BBAXvsEWAETF Comparison
ETF 1
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.5%
VS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. BBAX's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, EWA's top sector exposures are Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Energy. BBAX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.5% for EWA. BBAX is up 12.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$349M in YTD flows. EWA performs worse with 10.91% YTD performance, and -$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BBAX and EWA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BBAX vs EWA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BBAX EWA | +2.47%+0.29% | -0.52%-3.38% | +12.10%+10.91% | +17.50%+12.59% | +42.27%+37.08% | +37.82%+40.98% |
| Flows | BBAX EWA | +$42M-$119M | +$110M-$8M | +$349M-$40M | +$571M-$366M | +$949M-$1.20B | +$1.93B-$298M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BBAX EWA | +14.54%+17.18% | +13.93%+16.77% | +16.06%+18.75% | +16.96%+20.02% |
| Max drawdown | BBAX EWA | -6.17%-7.01% | -8.97%-9.96% | -19.95%-22.08% | -23.02%-24.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | BBAX EWA | 72d89d | 142d48d | 240d252d | 871d702d |
Trading data
BBAX | EWA | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $62.14 | $28.75 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $62.07 | $28.63 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BBAX | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BBAX | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.14 | $28.75 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | +0.42% |
| AuM | $6.51 B | $1.34 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
BBAX | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index | MSCI Australia Index |
| N° of holdings | 95 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 8, 2018 | March 12, 1996 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BBAX
Australia
65.12%
Hong Kong
17.64%
Singapore
14.25%
Other
3%
EWA
Australia
98.82%
Other
1.18%
Sectors
BBAX
Finance
52.94%
Non-Energy Materi.
17.43%
Other
29.63%
EWA
Finance
45.34%
Non-Energy Materi.
26.28%
Other
28.38%
Advertisement
Diversification
BBAX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.38%
EWA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.74%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
BBAX
BHP Group Ltd.
9.81%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
9.09%
AIA Group Ltd.
5.13%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
4.58%
Westpac Banking Corp.
4.09%
National Australia Bank Ltd.
3.82%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
3.52%
Wesfarmers Ltd.
2.90%
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
2.83%
Macquarie Group Ltd.
2.83%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
2.76%
Rio Tinto Ltd.
2.30%
Goodman Group
1.99%
Woodside Energy Group Ltd.
1.91%
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
1.83%
EWA
BHP Group Ltd.
15.67%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
13.66%
Westpac Banking Corp.
6.09%
National Australia Bank Ltd.
5.67%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
5.25%
Wesfarmers Ltd.
4.48%
Macquarie Group Ltd.
4.27%
Rio Tinto Ltd.
3.42%
Goodman Group
3.12%
Woodside Energy Group Ltd.
2.88%
CSL Ltd.
2.32%
Transurban Group Ltd.
2.31%
Woolworths Group Ltd.
2.13%
Fortescue Ltd.
1.78%
QBE Insurance Group Ltd.
1.68%
Frequently asked questions about BBAX and EWA
How have the BBAX and EWA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, BBAX is up 12.1% year-to-date (YTD), while EWA has returned 10.91%. That puts BBAX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BBAX or EWA?
Year-to-date, the BBAX ETF saw +$349M in flows, compared to -$40M for EWA.
Which ETF is more volatile: BBAX or EWA?
Over the past year, BBAX had a volatility of 13.93%, while EWA experienced 16.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: BBAX or EWA?
As of July 17, 2026, BBAX holds $6.51 B in assets under management (AUM), while EWA manages $1.34 B.
What sectors do the BBAX and EWA ETFs invest in?
BBAX leans toward sectors like Finance and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, EWA focuses on Finance and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the BBAX ETF and EWA ETF?
BBAX top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Commonwealth Bank of Australia and AIA Group Ltd.. EWA holds in its top three: BHP Group Ltd., Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Westpac Banking Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: BBAX or EWA?
BBAX holds 96 securities with 59.38% of its assets in the top 15. EWA has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.74%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
