BBAXvsEWAETF Comparison
ETF 1
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.56%
VS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. BBAX's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Real Estate. In contrast, EWA's top sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary. BBAX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.5% for EWA. BBAX is up 10.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$261M in YTD flows. EWA performs better with 11.61% YTD performance, and +$42M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BBAX and EWA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BBAX vs EWA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BBAX EWA | +2.12%+2.19% | -1.77%-2.35% | +10.91%+11.61% | +22.32%+17.98% | +48.24%+46.57% | +29.10%+34.15% |
| Flows | BBAX EWA | +$22M+$97M | +$76M+$57M | +$261M+$42M | +$450M-$248M | +$730M-$1.13B | +$1.94B-$227M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BBAX EWA | +17.45%+21.37% | +13.54%+16.47% | +16.21%+18.92% | +16.90%+19.99% |
| Max drawdown | BBAX EWA | -8.11%-9.58% | -8.97%-9.96% | -19.95%-22.08% | -24.32%-24.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | BBAX EWA | 39d39d | 93d48d | 240d252d | 1193d702d |
Trading data
BBAX | EWA | |
Last sale 5/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.94 | $29.25 |
| Previous close 05/28/2026 | $61.48 | $28.97 |
| Consolidated volume 05/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BBAX | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BBAX | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.94 | $29.25 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | +0.97% |
| AuM | $6.41 B | $1.46 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
BBAX | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index | MSCI Australia Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 8, 2018 | March 12, 1996 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BBAX
Australia
65%
Hong Kong
15.53%
Singapore
14.29%
Other
5.19%
EWA
Australia
98.54%
Other
1.46%
Sectors
BBAX
Financials
45.22%
Materials
14.63%
Real Estate
8.18%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
24.34%
EWA
Financials
41.41%
Materials
22.4%
Other
36.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
BBAX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.94%
EWA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.58%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
BBAX
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
9.62%
BHP GROUP LTD
8.12%
AIA
5.48%
WESTPAC BANKING
4.59%
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS
4.36%
NATL AUST BANK
4.24%
AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND BANKING
3.61%
HONG KONG EXCHANGES AND CLEARING
2.85%
WESFARMERS ORDINARY
2.75%
OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING
2.64%
MACQUARIE GROUP LTD
2.40%
CSL
2.28%
WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP
2.26%
RIO TINTO ORDINARY
1.88%
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK
1.85%
EWA
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
14.29%
BHP GROUP LTD
13.03%
WESTPAC BANKING
6.87%
NATL AUST BANK
6.47%
AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND BANKING
5.52%
WESFARMERS ORDINARY
4.21%
MACQUARIE GROUP LTD
3.72%
CSL
3.48%
WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP
3.39%
RIO TINTO ORDINARY
3.05%
GOODMAN GROUP CF
2.66%
WOOLWORTHS GROUP
2.27%
TRANSURBAN GRP REIT
2.22%
FORTESCUE METALS GROUP
1.75%
QBE INSURANCE GROUP
1.63%
Frequently asked questions about BBAX and EWA
How have the BBAX and EWA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 29, 2026, BBAX is up 10.91% year-to-date (YTD), while EWA has returned 11.61%. That puts EWA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BBAX or EWA?
Year-to-date, the BBAX ETF saw +$261M in flows, compared to +$42M for EWA.
Which ETF is more volatile: BBAX or EWA?
Over the past year, BBAX had a volatility of 13.54%, while EWA experienced 16.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: BBAX or EWA?
As of May 29, 2026, BBAX holds $6.41 B in assets under management (AUM), while EWA manages $1.46 B.
What sectors do the BBAX and EWA ETFs invest in?
BBAX leans toward sectors like Financials, Materials and Real Estate. Meanwhile, EWA focuses on Financials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the BBAX ETF and EWA ETF?
BBAX top holdings include COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, BHP GROUP LTD and AIA. EWA holds in its top three: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, BHP GROUP LTD and WESTPAC BANKING.
Which ETF is more diversified: BBAX or EWA?
BBAX holds 96 securities with 58.94% of its assets in the top 15. EWA has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.58%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
