BATTvsLITETF Comparison
VS
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. BATT's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. BATT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.75% for LIT. BATT is up 20.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with 26.34% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BATT and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BATT vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BATT LIT | +1.60%-1.80% | +13.39%+16.02% | +20.77%+26.34% | +89.10%+124.47% | +35.17%+28.40% | +14.06%+24.26% |
| Flows | BATT LIT | -$813K-$199M | +$13M-$11M | +$20M+$35M | +$27M+$79M | -$24M-$1.28B | -$326K-$901M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BATT LIT | +30.54%+28.85% | +25.30%+27.77% | +23.57%+26.02% | +24.67%+26.27% |
| Max drawdown | BATT LIT | -13.21%-14.18% | -14.11%-14.18% | -46.41%-51.18% | -60.61%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | BATT LIT | 36d38d | 47d38d | 799d895d | 1646d1669d |
Trading data
BATT | LIT | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $16.57 | $82.15 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $16.60 | $83.07 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $16.57 | $82.15 |
| 1D performance | -0.18% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $135.59 M | $1.90 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
BATT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index | Solactive Global Lithium Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 32 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 6, 2018 | July 22, 2010 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BATT
USA
25.42%
China
25.26%
Australia
13.81%
Canada
8.04%
Other
27.47%
LIT
USA
34.43%
China
33.42%
Republic of Korea
13.2%
Australia
8.99%
Japan
7.28%
Other
2.68%
Sectors
BATT
Materials
50.65%
Consumer Discreti.
16.74%
Industrials
15.77%
Other
16.84%
LIT
Materials
32.35%
Industrials
18.52%
Information Techn.
14.84%
Consumer Discreti.
9.35%
Other
24.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
BATT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.02%
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.74%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
BATT
AMPEREX TECH
7.76%
BHP GROUP LTD
7.05%
TESLA
5.98%
BYD
5.72%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
4.76%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
3.75%
SAMSUNG SDI
2.64%
TDK
2.60%
GRUPO MEXICO
2.46%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
2.25%
ALBEMARLE
2.12%
SHOWA DENKO
2.09%
GANFENG LITHIUM CO LTD
2.00%
TINCI MATERIALS
1.94%
PILBARA MINERALS
1.90%
LIT
US7672041008
19.03%
SAMSUNG SDI
7.20%
ALBEMARLE
6.77%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
4.29%
PILBARA MINERALS
4.02%
GANFENG LITHIUM
3.99%
US8336351056
3.93%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
3.58%
AMPEREX TECH
3.49%
TIANQI LITHIUM
3.24%
TDK
3.00%
TINCI MATERIALS
2.90%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
2.82%
BYD
2.79%
EVE ENERGY
2.71%
Frequently asked questions about BATT and LIT
How have the BATT and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, BATT is up 20.77% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 26.34%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BATT or LIT?
Year-to-date, the BATT ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to +$35M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: BATT or LIT?
Over the past year, BATT had a volatility of 25.3%, while LIT experienced 27.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: BATT or LIT?
As of June 18, 2026, BATT holds $135.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.90 B.
What sectors do the BATT and LIT ETFs invest in?
BATT leans toward sectors like Materials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Materials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the BATT ETF and LIT ETF?
BATT top holdings include AMPEREX TECH, BHP GROUP LTD and TESLA. LIT holds in its top three: US7672041008, SAMSUNG SDI and ALBEMARLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: BATT or LIT?
BATT holds 48 securities with 55.02% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.74%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BATT & LIT
Tesla’s Rally Propels Consumer Discretionary Index and EV ETFs
July 8, 2024
BATT
LIT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
BATT
LIT
Advertisement
Advertisement
