BASGvsREGSETF Comparison
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. BASG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, REGS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. BASG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.35% for REGS. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BASG and REGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BASG vs REGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BASG REGS | +10.92%+17.45% | -0.39%n/a | -2.24%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BASG REGS | -$6M-$10M | -$26M- | -$57M- | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BASG REGS | +21.79%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BASG REGS | -13.68%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BASG REGS | 86dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
BASG | REGS | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.92 | $10.95 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $25.28 | $11.06 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BASG | REGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.92 | $10.95 |
| 1D performance | -1.43% | -0.99% |
| AuM | $469.78 M | $67.55 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.35% |
BASG | REGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brown Advisory | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 58 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2025 | March 13, 2026 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
