BAMVvsLVDSETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
This fund is part of
US Large Cap Value
+1.56%
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. BAMV's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, LVDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. BAMV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.51% for LVDS. BAMV is up 14.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. LVDS performs better with 26.52% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMV and LVDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMV vs LVDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMV LVDS | +0.96%+5.59% | -0.88%+2.68% | +14.41%+26.52% | +15.43%+22.97% | +52.57%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BAMV LVDS | +$1M+$5M | +$21M+$8M | +$14M+$10M | +$13M+$1M | +$80M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMV LVDS | +9.22%+8.37% | +11.20%+12.40% | +13.13%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BAMV LVDS | -5.97%-4.32% | -5.97%-7.75% | -14.52%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMV LVDS | 69d73d | 69d126d | 213dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
BAMV | LVDS | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $35.96 | |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $37.05 | |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
BAMV | LVDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.96 | – |
| 1D performance | -2.94% | – |
| AuM | $123.95 M | $122.95 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
BAMV | LVDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 131 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 27, 2023 | July 17, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMV
USA
95.53%
Other
4.47%
LVDS
USA
94.41%
Other
5.59%
Sectors
BAMV
Finance
31.02%
Technology
20.37%
Healthcare
10.68%
Industrials
10.49%
Other
27.45%
LVDS
Finance
22.86%
Technology
20.65%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.21%
Healthcare
12.11%
Industrials
10.6%
Other
20.57%
Diversification
BAMV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.43%
LVDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
BAMV
Microsoft Corp.
9.28%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.86%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.68%
Bank of America Corp.
4.27%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.63%
American Express Co.
2.52%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
2.50%
The Walt Disney Co.
2.39%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.36%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.24%
Union Pacific Corp.
2.11%
AT&T, Inc.
1.93%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.91%
Newmont Corp.
1.89%
Pfizer Inc.
1.88%
LVDS
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.39%
Microsoft Corp.
5.92%
Apple, Inc.
5.53%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.40%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.95%
Bank of America Corp.
1.91%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.75%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.67%
Wells Fargo & Co.
1.57%
Johnson & Johnson
1.51%
RTX Corp.
1.34%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.33%
Morgan Stanley
1.32%
Deere & Co.
1.27%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.22%
Frequently asked questions about BAMV and LVDS
How have the BAMV and LVDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 3, 2026, BAMV is up 14.41% year-to-date (YTD), while LVDS has returned 26.52%. That puts LVDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMV or LVDS?
Year-to-date, the BAMV ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to +$10M for LVDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMV or LVDS?
Over the past year, BAMV had a volatility of 11.2%, while LVDS experienced 12.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMV or LVDS?
As of November 3, 2026, BAMV holds $123.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while LVDS manages $122.95 M.
What sectors do the BAMV and LVDS ETFs invest in?
BAMV leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, LVDS focuses on Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the BAMV ETF and LVDS ETF?
BAMV top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Cisco Systems, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. LVDS holds in its top three: Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMV or LVDS?
BAMV holds 99 securities with 47.43% of its assets in the top 15. LVDS has 131 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.06%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
