BAMVvsLVDSETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
This fund is part of
US Large Cap Value
+1.16%
Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. BAMV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.51% for LVDS. BAMV is up 15.43% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. LVDS performs better with 23.23% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMV and LVDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMV vs LVDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMV LVDS | +4.61%+4.30% | +7.32%+12.56% | +15.43%+23.23% | +19.35%+23.96% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BAMV LVDS | -$2M- | -$4M-$50K | -$7M+$2M | -$14M-$13M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMV LVDS | +10.90%+11.03% | +11.82%+12.49% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BAMV LVDS | -3.05%-1.90% | -6.32%-7.75% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMV LVDS | 11d7d | 70d126d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
BAMV | LVDS | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 7:37 PM | $37.72 | |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $37.22 | |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 7:37 PM
Live
Closed
BAMV | LVDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.72 | – |
| 1D performance | +1.34% | – |
| AuM | $104.56 M | $112.56 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
BAMV | LVDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 134 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 27, 2023 | July 17, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMV
USA
95.84%
Other
4.16%
LVDS
USA
93.84%
Other
6.16%
Sectors
BAMV
Finance
33.45%
Technology
19.24%
Industrials
11.66%
Healthcare
9.48%
Other
26.17%
LVDS
Finance
24.05%
Technology
22.29%
Industrials
12.15%
Healthcare
10.29%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.3%
Other
21.91%
Diversification
BAMV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.13%
LVDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.96%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
BAMV
Microsoft Corp.
6.94%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.45%
Bank of America Corp.
5.09%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.76%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.92%
American Express Co.
2.88%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
2.58%
Western Digital Corp.
2.54%
The Walt Disney Co.
2.25%
Union Pacific Corp.
2.17%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.12%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.07%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.85%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
1.82%
AT&T, Inc.
1.68%
LVDS
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.27%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.12%
Bank of America Corp.
2.10%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.06%
Wells Fargo & Co.
1.74%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.74%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.69%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.68%
Morgan Stanley
1.64%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.63%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.61%
RTX Corp.
1.44%
Johnson & Johnson
1.41%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
1.31%
Frequently asked questions about BAMV and LVDS
How have the BAMV and LVDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, BAMV is up 15.43% year-to-date (YTD), while LVDS has returned 23.23%. That puts LVDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMV or LVDS?
Year-to-date, the BAMV ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$2M for LVDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMV or LVDS?
Over the past year, BAMV had a volatility of 11.82%, while LVDS experienced 12.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMV or LVDS?
As of August 3, 2026, BAMV holds $104.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while LVDS manages $112.56 M.
What sectors do the BAMV and LVDS ETFs invest in?
BAMV leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, LVDS focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BAMV ETF and LVDS ETF?
BAMV top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Cisco Systems, Inc. and Bank of America Corp.. LVDS holds in its top three: Micron Technology, Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMV or LVDS?
BAMV holds 99 securities with 47.13% of its assets in the top 15. LVDS has 135 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.96%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
