BAMOvsRFFCETF Comparison
VS
Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF (RFFC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BAMO's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Technology and Finance. In contrast, RFFC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. BAMO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.12%, versus 0.48% for RFFC. BAMO is up 7.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$487K in YTD flows. RFFC performs better with 14.54% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMO and RFFC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMO vs RFFC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMO RFFC | +0.46%+1.19% | +1.31%+3.03% | +7.82%+14.54% | +12.19%+24.38% | n/a+76.04% | n/a+72.27% |
| Flows | BAMO RFFC | -+$2M | -$3M+$2M | +$487K+$2M | -$229K+$5M | --$3M | --$31M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMO RFFC | +7.83%+11.83% | +7.01%+12.39% | n/a+13.98% | n/a+16.41% |
| Max drawdown | BAMO RFFC | -2.43%-3.28% | -5.47%-9.22% | n/a-18.38% | n/a-22.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMO RFFC | 29d25d | 65d50d | n/a152d | n/a710d |
Trading data
BAMO | RFFC | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.89 | $76.49 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $34.77 | $76.21 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BAMO | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.89 | $76.49 |
| 1D performance | +0.36% | +0.36% |
| AuM | $46.42 M | $32.52 M |
| E/R | 1.12% | 0.48% |
Characteristics
BAMO | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | ALPS |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 522 | 57 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2023 | June 16, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMO
USA
98.63%
Other
1.37%
RFFC
USA
91.35%
Other
8.65%
Sectors
BAMO
Sovereign
37.73%
Technology
23.1%
Finance
11.66%
Other
27.5%
RFFC
Technology
38.03%
Finance
12.61%
Healthcare
12.58%
Industrials
9.86%
Other
26.92%
Diversification
BAMO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.63%
RFFC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
BAMO
Apple, Inc.
3.80%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.59%
Microsoft Corp.
3.32%
USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D)
2.67%
USA, Bills 0% 10sep2026, USD (182D)
2.65%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
2.63%
USA, Bills 0% 3sep2026, USD (364D)
2.55%
USA, Bills 0% 29oct2026, USD (364D)
2.43%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.26%
USA, Bills 0% 1oct2026, USD (364D)
2.26%
Caterpillar, Inc.
2.19%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.17%
USA, Bills 0% 1sep2026, USD (119D)
2.15%
USA, Bills 0% 17sep2026, USD (182D)
1.99%
USA, Bills 0% 15sep2026, USD (119D)
1.98%
RFFC
Microsoft Corp.
5.45%
Apple, Inc.
5.17%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.02%
State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund
4.91%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.43%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.95%
Johnson & Johnson
3.87%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.81%
Caterpillar, Inc.
2.56%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.53%
Amphenol Corp.
2.50%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
2.34%
Snowflake, Inc.
2.31%
RTX Corp.
2.25%
Lam Research Corp.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about BAMO and RFFC
How have the BAMO and RFFC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, BAMO is up 7.82% year-to-date (YTD), while RFFC has returned 14.54%. That puts RFFC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMO or RFFC?
Year-to-date, the BAMO ETF saw +$487K in flows, compared to +$2M for RFFC.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMO or RFFC?
Over the past year, BAMO had a volatility of 7.01%, while RFFC experienced 12.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMO or RFFC?
As of September 2, 2026, BAMO holds $46.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while RFFC manages $32.52 M.
What sectors do the BAMO and RFFC ETFs invest in?
BAMO leans toward sectors like Sovereign, Technology and Finance. Meanwhile, RFFC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the BAMO ETF and RFFC ETF?
BAMO top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. RFFC holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMO or RFFC?
BAMO holds 530 securities with 38.63% of its assets in the top 15. RFFC has 57 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.32%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
