BAMGvsLCOWETF Comparison
VS
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. BAMG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.88%, versus 0.49% for LCOW. BAMG is up 8.53% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. LCOW performs worse with 6.32% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMG and LCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMG vs LCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMG LCOW | +3.51%+2.09% | +14.88%+10.25% | +8.53%+6.32% | +23.29%+20.13% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BAMG LCOW | -+$1M | +$6M+$7M | -$8M+$8M | +$3M+$13M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMG LCOW | +18.95%+14.68% | +15.08%+12.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BAMG LCOW | -7.74%-5.79% | -13.08%-10.34% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMG LCOW | 21d21d | 126d91d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
BAMG | LCOW | |
Last sale 6/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.68 | $25.35 |
| Previous close 06/15/2026 | $43.62 | $25.06 |
| Consolidated volume 06/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BAMG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBAMG | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BAMG | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.68 | $25.35 |
| 1D performance | +2.43% | +1.17% |
| AuM | $137.84 M | $25.36 M |
| E/R | 0.88% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
BAMG | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 95 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 27, 2023 | May 6, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMG
USA
96.49%
Other
3.51%
LCOW
USA
99.34%
Other
0.66%
Sectors
BAMG
Information Techn.
38.81%
Health Care
12.19%
Communication Ser.
11.17%
Industrials
8.5%
Consumer Staples
8.34%
Other
20.99%
LCOW
Information Techn.
50.26%
Health Care
15.22%
Communication Ser.
10.96%
Financials
7.2%
Other
16.36%
Advertisement
Diversification
BAMG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.47%
LCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.64%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
BAMG
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.79%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.71%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.63%
NVIDIA
4.56%
META PLATFORMS
4.32%
APPLE
4.12%
LILLY
3.68%
VISA INCORPORATION
2.76%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
2.73%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.54%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
2.12%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
2.02%
MASTERCARD
1.93%
NETFLIX
1.81%
CATERPILLAR
1.77%
LCOW
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.73%
NVIDIA
5.72%
MICROSOFT-T
5.45%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.32%
META PLATFORMS
5.32%
APPLE
4.97%
VISA INCORPORATION
4.82%
MASTERCARD
4.80%
ABBVIE
4.01%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
3.22%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.69%
US5128073062
2.13%
KLA CORPORATION
1.95%
CISCO-T
1.81%
APPLIED MATERIAL
1.70%
Frequently asked questions about BAMG and LCOW
How have the BAMG and LCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, BAMG is up 8.53% year-to-date (YTD), while LCOW has returned 6.32%. That puts BAMG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMG or LCOW?
Year-to-date, the BAMG ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$8M for LCOW.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMG or LCOW?
Over the past year, BAMG had a volatility of 15.08%, while LCOW experienced 12.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMG or LCOW?
As of June 12, 2026, BAMG holds $137.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while LCOW manages $25.36 M.
What sectors do the BAMG and LCOW ETFs invest in?
BAMG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, LCOW focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the BAMG ETF and LCOW ETF?
BAMG top holdings include BROADCOM LIMITED, AMAZON.COM INC and ALPHABET INC-CL. LCOW holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, NVIDIA and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMG or LCOW?
BAMG holds 97 securities with 48.47% of its assets in the top 15. LCOW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.64%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
