BAMDvsNUDVETF Comparison
VS
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. BAMD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. In contrast, NUDV's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. BAMD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.87%, versus 0.26% for NUDV. BAMD is up 17.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. NUDV performs worse with 14.99% YTD performance, and +$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMD and NUDV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMD vs NUDV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMD NUDV | +1.80%+0.86% | +7.97%+5.10% | +17.71%+14.99% | +14.74%+20.37% | n/a+53.85% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BAMD NUDV | -$1M+$3M | -$3M+$7M | -$12M+$12M | -$12M+$16M | -+$36M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMD NUDV | +9.67%+9.91% | +10.23%+10.10% | n/a+13.06% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BAMD NUDV | -2.17%-1.94% | -7.01%-6.81% | n/a-16.48% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMD NUDV | 17d17d | 88d81d | n/a323d | n/an/a |
Trading data
BAMD | NUDV | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 3:48 PM | $34.76 | $34.01 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $34.53 | $33.85 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BAMD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBAMD | NUDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 3:48 PM
Live
Closed
BAMD | NUDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.76 | $34.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.67% | +0.47% |
| AuM | $99.04 M | $54.22 M |
| E/R | 0.87% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
BAMD | NUDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | Nuveen |
| Benchmark | - | TIAA ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 85 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2023 | September 28, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMD
USA
87.97%
Other
12.03%
NUDV
USA
93.91%
Other
6.09%
Sectors
BAMD
Finance
30.24%
Technology
12.76%
Energy
12.21%
Utilities
11.9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.78%
Other
21.1%
NUDV
Finance
28.47%
Healthcare
13.88%
Technology
11.17%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.39%
Industrials
9.47%
Other
26.63%
Advertisement
Diversification
BAMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.67%
NUDV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.87%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
BAMD
Paychex, Inc.
5.73%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
5.34%
Blackstone, Inc.
5.11%
Eversource Energy
4.71%
Edison International
4.60%
ONEOK, Inc.
4.56%
PepsiCo, Inc.
4.04%
Procter & Gamble Co.
3.74%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
3.31%
Millicom International Cellular SA
3.08%
Viper Energy, Inc.
2.92%
Amgen, Inc.
2.29%
Linde Plc
2.19%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.12%
H&R Block, Inc.
1.95%
NUDV
The Coca-Cola Co.
2.71%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
2.58%
Morgan Stanley
2.38%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.36%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.32%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.14%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.13%
International Business Machines Corp.
2.09%
Union Pacific Corp.
2.01%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.00%
Deere & Co.
1.87%
U.S. Bancorp
1.82%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
1.82%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.82%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.81%
Frequently asked questions about BAMD and NUDV
How have the BAMD and NUDV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, BAMD is up 17.71% year-to-date (YTD), while NUDV has returned 14.99%. That puts BAMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMD or NUDV?
Year-to-date, the BAMD ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to +$12M for NUDV.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMD or NUDV?
Over the past year, BAMD had a volatility of 10.23%, while NUDV experienced 10.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMD or NUDV?
As of September 2, 2026, BAMD holds $99.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUDV manages $54.22 M.
What sectors do the BAMD and NUDV ETFs invest in?
BAMD leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, NUDV focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the BAMD ETF and NUDV ETF?
BAMD top holdings include Paychex, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Blackstone, Inc.. NUDV holds in its top three: The Coca-Cola Co., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Morgan Stanley.
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMD or NUDV?
BAMD holds 96 securities with 55.67% of its assets in the top 15. NUDV has 85 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.87%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
