BAMDvsFVDETF Comparison
VS
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend ETF - USD (FVD) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. BAMD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, FVD's top sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Industrials. BAMD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.87%, versus 0.61% for FVD. BAMD is up 15.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$11M in YTD flows. FVD performs worse with 9.01% YTD performance, and -$1.08B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMD and FVD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMD vs FVD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMD FVD | +0.27%+1.90% | -0.53%-0.44% | +15.15%+9.01% | +14.19%+10.98% | +49.85%+40.76% | n/a+35.30% |
| Flows | BAMD FVD | -$70K-$102M | -$104K-$324M | -$11M-$1.08B | -$11M-$1.56B | +$75M-$5.34B | --$5.96B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMD FVD | +10.04%+9.30% | +10.32%+10.10% | +13.00%+11.27% | n/a+12.92% |
| Max drawdown | BAMD FVD | -8.28%-7.64% | -8.28%-7.64% | -15.99%-11.94% | n/a-16.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMD FVD | 61d53d | 61d53d | 561d233d | n/a792d |
Trading data
BAMD | FVD | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.85 | $49.57 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $33.48 | $48.92 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BAMD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBAMD | FVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BAMD | FVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.85 | $49.57 |
| 1D performance | +1.11% | +1.33% |
| AuM | $98.24 M | $7.88 B |
| E/R | 0.87% | 0.61% |
Characteristics
BAMD | FVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | Value Line Dividend Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 240 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2023 | August 19, 2003 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMD
USA
82.77%
Other
17.23%
FVD
USA
79.99%
Canada
7.11%
Other
12.9%
Sectors
BAMD
Finance
30.37%
Technology
13.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.45%
Utilities
10.27%
Energy
7.96%
Other
26.49%
FVD
Finance
29.28%
Utilities
18%
Industrials
11.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.64%
Healthcare
7.48%
Other
22.86%
Advertisement
Diversification
BAMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.55%
FVD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
BAMD
Paychex, Inc.
6.11%
Blackstone, Inc.
5.61%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
5.29%
US30609A1097
4.75%
Eversource Energy
4.55%
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.97%
Procter & Gamble Co.
3.68%
Edison International
3.32%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
3.18%
Millicom International Cellular SA
2.96%
Viper Energy, Inc.
2.87%
Amgen, Inc.
2.50%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.33%
H&R Block, Inc.
2.24%
Linde Plc
2.19%
FVD
The Williams Cos., Inc.
0.45%
The J. M. Smucker Co.
0.44%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
0.44%
Chevron Corp.
0.44%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
0.44%
Infosys Ltd.
0.43%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
0.43%
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
0.43%
Entergy Corp.
0.43%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.43%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.
0.43%
TotalEnergies SE
0.43%
TC Energy Corp.
0.43%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
0.43%
Novartis AG
0.43%
Frequently asked questions about BAMD and FVD
How have the BAMD and FVD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BAMD is up 15.15% year-to-date (YTD), while FVD has returned 9.01%. That puts BAMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMD or FVD?
Year-to-date, the BAMD ETF saw -$11M in flows, compared to -$1.08B for FVD.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMD or FVD?
Over the past year, BAMD had a volatility of 10.32%, while FVD experienced 10.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMD or FVD?
As of October 16, 2026, BAMD holds $98.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while FVD manages $7.88 B.
What sectors do the BAMD and FVD ETFs invest in?
BAMD leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FVD focuses on Finance, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BAMD ETF and FVD ETF?
BAMD top holdings include Paychex, Inc., Blackstone, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. FVD holds in its top three: The Williams Cos., Inc., The J. M. Smucker Co. and Kinder Morgan, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMD or FVD?
BAMD holds 96 securities with 55.55% of its assets in the top 15. FVD has 240 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
