Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BAMDvsFDVETF Comparison
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. BAMD's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Financials and Real Estate. In contrast, FDV's top sector exposures are Utilities, Financials and Health Care. BAMD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.87%, versus 0.61% for FDV. BAMD is up 5.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. FDV performs better with 8.45% YTD performance, and -$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMD and FDV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BAMD vs FDV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMD FDV | -3.34%-2.79% | +4.45%+7.93% | +5.04%+8.45% | +2.73%+14.24% | n/a+44.17% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BAMD FDV | +$319K+$23M | -$5M+$5M | -$6M-$19M | +$7M+$279M | -+$498M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMD FDV | +9.86%+9.44% | +14.62%+13.73% | n/a+12.33% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BAMD FDV | -4.10%-3.51% | -11.56%-11.41% | n/a-12.77% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMD FDV | 17d10d | 308d92d | n/a129d | n/an/a |
BAMD | FDV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.23 | $30.78 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $31.14 | $30.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BAMD | FDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.23 | $30.78 |
| 1D performance | +0.29% | +0.16% |
| AuM | $96.12 M | $616.64 M |
| E/R | 0.87% | 0.61% |
BAMD | FDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 49 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2023 | November 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BAMD and FDV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BAMD is up 5.04% year-to-date (YTD), while FDV has returned 8.45%. That puts FDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMD or FDV?
Year-to-date, the BAMD ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$19M for FDV.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMD or FDV?
Over the past year, BAMD had a volatility of 14.62%, while FDV experienced 13.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMD or FDV?
As of March 11, 2026, BAMD holds $96.12 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDV manages $616.64 M.
What sectors do the BAMD and FDV ETFs invest in?
BAMD leans toward sectors like Utilities, Financials and Real Estate. Meanwhile, FDV focuses on Utilities, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the BAMD ETF and FDV ETF?
BAMD top holdings include US, FORD MOTOR and GILEAD SCIENCES. FDV holds in its top three: PNC FINL SVC, US and CHEVRON TEXACO.
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMD or FDV?
BAMD holds 29 securities with 55.4% of its assets in the top 15. FDV has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.14%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
