BAMBvsJCPBETF Comparison
VS
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) belong to the same industry segment: US Aggregate Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: BAMB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.01%, versus 0.4% for JCPB. BAMB is down -0.4% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. JCPB performs better with 0.42% YTD performance, and +$1.69B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMB and JCPB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMB vs JCPB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMB JCPB | -1.54%-1.23% | -0.36%+0.49% | -0.40%+0.42% | +2.80%+5.17% | n/a+14.66% | n/a+6.73% |
| Flows | BAMB JCPB | -+$569M | -$3M+$1.69B | -$3M+$1.69B | +$534K+$4.86B | -+$10.00B | -+$10.77B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMB JCPB | +4.07%+4.01% | +4.33%+4.13% | n/a+5.34% | n/a+5.62% |
| Max drawdown | BAMB JCPB | -2.69%-2.60% | -2.69%-2.62% | n/a-6.90% | n/a-16.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMB JCPB | 31d32d | 31d81d | n/a223d | n/a1416d |
Trading data
BAMB | JCPB | |
Last sale 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.27 | $46.99 |
| Previous close 04/02/2026 | $26.23 | $46.88 |
| Consolidated volume 04/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BAMB | JCPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.27 | $46.99 |
| 1D performance | +0.13% | +0.22% |
| AuM | $62.14 M | $10.92 B |
| E/R | 1.01% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
BAMB | JCPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | 1287 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 27, 2023 | January 28, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMB
Data will be available soon
JCPB
USA
92.18%
Other
7.82%
Sectors
BAMB
Data will be available soon
JCPB
Sovereign
15.81%
Other
84.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
BAMB
Data will be available soon
JCPB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.27%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BAMB
Data will be available soon
JCPB
USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2029, USD (AC-2029)
4.09%
USA, Notes 4.125% 30nov2029, USD (AG-2029)
1.49%
US01F0526313
1.09%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
1.04%
USA, Notes 0.5% 31aug2027, USD (P-2027)
0.93%
US91282CNX55
0.84%
USA, Bonds 4% 15nov2052, USD
0.73%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15nov2053, USD
0.73%
USA, Bonds 2.375% 15may2051, USD
0.52%
USA, Bonds 4% 15nov2042, USD
0.52%
USA, Bonds 4.5% 15nov2054, USD
0.51%
US01F0606347
0.51%
USA, Bonds 3.375% 15nov2048, USD
0.46%
USA, Bonds 4.75% 15nov2043, USD
0.43%
US31427NUB36
0.39%
Frequently asked questions about BAMB and JCPB
How have the BAMB and JCPB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 1, 2026, BAMB is down -0.4% year-to-date (YTD), while JCPB has returned 0.42%. That puts JCPB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMB or JCPB?
Year-to-date, the BAMB ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$1.69B for JCPB.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMB or JCPB?
Over the past year, BAMB had a volatility of 4.33%, while JCPB experienced 4.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMB or JCPB?
As of April 1, 2026, BAMB holds $62.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while JCPB manages $10.92 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
