BAMAvsCGBLETF Comparison
VS
Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) is part of the Multi-Asset: Moderate segment. BAMA's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Sovereign and Finance. In contrast, CGBL's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. BAMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.03%, versus 0.33% for CGBL. BAMA is up 8.53% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. CGBL performs worse with 5.85% YTD performance, and +$3.20B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMA and CGBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMA vs CGBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMA CGBL | +0.69%-0.05% | +0.32%-0.85% | +8.53%+5.85% | +10.53%+8.25% | +50.51%+54.73% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BAMA CGBL | -$2M+$256M | -$4M+$874M | -$4M+$3.20B | -$5M+$3.91B | +$31M+$7.17B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMA CGBL | +9.56%+8.52% | +10.80%+10.47% | +10.40%+10.95% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BAMA CGBL | -3.36%-4.17% | -7.36%-7.88% | -12.33%-11.64% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMA CGBL | 19d64d | 48d50d | 124d116d | n/an/a |
Trading data
BAMA | CGBL | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.34 | $36.85 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $36.23 | $36.85 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.34 | $36.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.29% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $46.43 M | $7.81 B |
| E/R | 1.03% | 0.33% |
Characteristics
BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 12824 | 1072 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2023 | September 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMA
USA
71.81%
Other
28.19%
CGBL
USA
77.82%
Other
22.18%
Sectors
BAMA
Technology
32.21%
Sovereign
21.53%
Finance
12.25%
Industrials
7.24%
Other
26.77%
CGBL
Technology
22.61%
Finance
14.49%
Industrials
10.65%
Sovereign
7.71%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.01%
Other
37.53%
Advertisement
Diversification
BAMA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.04%
CGBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
BAMA
NVIDIA Corp.
5.29%
Microsoft Corp.
3.73%
Apple, Inc.
3.11%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.75%
Broadcom Inc.
1.74%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.57%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.47%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.24%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.07%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.91%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.91%
Tesla, Inc.
0.77%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.75%
CGBL
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
5.79%
Broadcom Inc.
4.42%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.64%
Microsoft Corp.
2.49%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.14%
Apple, Inc.
2.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.45%
Royal Gold, Inc.
1.28%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.27%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.24%
ATI, Inc.
1.23%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
1.16%
US912810UX45
1.11%
Frequently asked questions about BAMA and CGBL
How have the BAMA and CGBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, BAMA is up 8.53% year-to-date (YTD), while CGBL has returned 5.85%. That puts BAMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMA or CGBL?
Year-to-date, the BAMA ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$3.20B for CGBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMA or CGBL?
Over the past year, BAMA had a volatility of 10.8%, while CGBL experienced 10.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMA or CGBL?
As of October 15, 2026, BAMA holds $46.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGBL manages $7.81 B.
What sectors do the BAMA and CGBL ETFs invest in?
BAMA leans toward sectors like Technology, Sovereign and Finance. Meanwhile, CGBL focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BAMA ETF and CGBL ETF?
BAMA top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Apple, Inc.. CGBL holds in its top three: Capital Group Central Cash Fund, Broadcom Inc. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMA or CGBL?
BAMA holds 14466 securities with 27.04% of its assets in the top 15. CGBL has 1857 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BAMA & CGBL
Advertisement
