BAMAvsCGBLETF Comparison
VS
Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) is part of the Multi-Asset: Moderate segment. BAMA's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Sovereign and Finance. In contrast, CGBL's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. BAMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.03%, versus 0.33% for CGBL. BAMA is up 9.78% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. CGBL performs worse with 8.88% YTD performance, and +$2.85B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BAMA and CGBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BAMA vs CGBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BAMA CGBL | +1.70%+1.46% | +0.84%+1.33% | +9.78%+8.88% | +15.09%+14.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BAMA CGBL | -$2M+$325M | -$3M+$948M | -$1M+$2.85B | -$1M+$3.89B | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BAMA CGBL | +12.28%+10.82% | +10.66%+10.45% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BAMA CGBL | -4.02%-3.06% | -7.36%-7.88% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BAMA CGBL | 60d8d | 48d50d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
BAMA | CGBL | |
Last sale 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.00 | $38.12 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $36.98 | $38.15 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.00 | $38.12 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | -0.08% |
| AuM | $49.55 M | $7.72 B |
| E/R | 1.03% | 0.33% |
Characteristics
BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Brookstone Asset Management | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 12935 | 1103 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2023 | September 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BAMA
USA
72.3%
Other
27.7%
CGBL
USA
78.21%
Other
21.79%
Sectors
BAMA
Technology
31.26%
Sovereign
22.19%
Finance
12.54%
Industrials
7.46%
Other
26.54%
CGBL
Technology
22.71%
Finance
14.77%
Industrials
11.33%
Sovereign
8.88%
Other
42.31%
Diversification
BAMA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.75%
CGBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.93%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
BAMA
NVIDIA Corp.
4.92%
Microsoft Corp.
3.50%
Apple, Inc.
3.10%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.11%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.87%
Broadcom Inc.
1.87%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.71%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.42%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.24%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.95%
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.94%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.92%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.79%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.76%
Tesla, Inc.
0.67%
CGBL
Broadcom Inc.
4.75%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
4.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Apple, Inc.
2.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.28%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.22%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.91%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.21%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.15%
The Boeing Co.
1.12%
ATI, Inc.
1.07%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.07%
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.05%
Frequently asked questions about BAMA and CGBL
How have the BAMA and CGBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 3, 2026, BAMA is up 9.78% year-to-date (YTD), while CGBL has returned 8.88%. That puts BAMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BAMA or CGBL?
Year-to-date, the BAMA ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$2.85B for CGBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: BAMA or CGBL?
Over the past year, BAMA had a volatility of 10.66%, while CGBL experienced 10.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: BAMA or CGBL?
As of September 3, 2026, BAMA holds $49.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGBL manages $7.72 B.
What sectors do the BAMA and CGBL ETFs invest in?
BAMA leans toward sectors like Technology, Sovereign and Finance. Meanwhile, CGBL focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BAMA ETF and CGBL ETF?
BAMA top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Apple, Inc.. CGBL holds in its top three: Broadcom Inc., Capital Group Central Cash Fund and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: BAMA or CGBL?
BAMA holds 14422 securities with 26.75% of its assets in the top 15. CGBL has 1862 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.93%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BAMA & CGBL
A Close Look at Capital Group's 5 New Active ETFs Listed on NYSE ARCA
October 26, 2023
CGBL
Advertisement
Advertisement
