Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AVUQvsILCGETF Comparison
Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. AVUQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, ILCG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. AVUQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.04% for ILCG. AVUQ is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. ILCG performs worse with -2.85% YTD performance, and -$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AVUQ and ILCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AVUQ vs ILCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AVUQ ILCG | -2.30%-1.67% | -1.79%-3.50% | -1.14%-2.85% | n/a+25.04% | n/a+101.93% | n/a+84.12% |
| Flows | AVUQ ILCG | +$10M-$41M | +$15M-$46M | +$13M-$35M | -+$34M | --$78M | --$203M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AVUQ ILCG | +15.10%+16.99% | n/a+22.81% | n/a+19.21% | n/a+22.03% |
| Max drawdown | AVUQ ILCG | -4.82%-6.06% | n/a-15.63% | n/a-23.24% | n/a-35.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | AVUQ ILCG | 41d41d | n/a45d | n/a151d | n/a807d |
AVUQ | ILCG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.35 | $101.12 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $59.40 | $100.98 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AVUQ | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AVUQ | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.35 | $101.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.14% |
| AuM | $194.52 M | $2.81 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.04% |
AVUQ | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | American Century Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 376 | 302 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2025 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AVUQ and ILCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, AVUQ is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCG has lost -2.85%. That puts AVUQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AVUQ or ILCG?
Year-to-date, the AVUQ ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to -$35M for ILCG.
Which ETF is bigger: AVUQ or ILCG?
As of March 9, 2026, AVUQ holds $194.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while ILCG manages $2.81 B.
What sectors do the AVUQ and ILCG ETFs invest in?
AVUQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, ILCG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the AVUQ ETF and ILCG ETF?
AVUQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ILCG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: AVUQ or ILCG?
AVUQ holds 381 securities with 59.78% of its assets in the top 15. ILCG has 330 securities and a top 15 weight of 62%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
