AUSMvsJABSETF Comparison
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. AUSM's top 1 sector exposures are Municipal. In contrast, JABS's top sector exposures are Industrials and Finance. AUSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.34% for JABS. AUSM is up 1.34% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. JABS performs better with 2.06% YTD performance, and +$48M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AUSM and JABS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AUSM vs JABS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AUSM JABS | -0.05%+0.27% | -0.01%+0.15% | +1.34%+2.06% | +1.96%+2.96% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | AUSM JABS | -+$41M | +$1M+$44M | +$3M+$48M | +$3M+$48M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AUSM JABS | +0.91%+1.32% | +0.57%+1.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | AUSM JABS | -0.89%-0.86% | -0.89%-1.06% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | AUSM JABS | 46d52d | 46d67d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
AUSM | JABS | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.93 | $49.44 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.90 | $49.47 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
AUSM | JABS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.93 | $49.44 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $32.88 M | $177.81 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.34% |
AUSM | JABS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Allspring | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 16 | 71 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 8, 2025 | July 23, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
