AUSFvsFLCVETF Comparison
VS
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. AUSF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.27%, versus 0.49% for FLCV. AUSF is up 9.34% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. FLCV performs better with 14.09% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AUSF and FLCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
AUSF vs FLCV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AUSF FLCV | +3.26%+3.84% | +4.18%+12.66% | +9.34%+14.09% | +17.13%+23.82% | +74.03%n/a | +88.84%n/a |
| Flows | AUSF FLCV | -$31M+$6M | +$5M+$20M | +$61M+$19M | +$208M+$51M | +$525M- | +$512M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AUSF FLCV | +9.61%+13.08% | +9.79%+11.58% | +12.63%n/a | +13.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown | AUSF FLCV | -2.41%-3.13% | -5.65%-5.72% | -12.33%n/a | -14.13%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | AUSF FLCV | 15d16d | 101d39d | 204dn/a | 215dn/a |
Trading data
AUSF | FLCV | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.02 | $35.46 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $49.67 | $35.21 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLCV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexAUSF | FLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
AUSF | FLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.02 | $35.46 |
| 1D performance | +0.70% | +0.72% |
| AuM | $866.46 M | $99.44 M |
| E/R | 0.27% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
AUSF | FLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 178 | 119 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 24, 2018 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
AUSF
USA
91.64%
Other
8.36%
FLCV
USA
90.64%
Other
9.36%
Sectors
AUSF
Financials
19.68%
Information Techn.
12.73%
Health Care
11.45%
Industrials
10.86%
Communication Ser.
9.87%
Consumer Discreti.
8.26%
Other
27.15%
FLCV
Financials
18.56%
Information Techn.
15.53%
Health Care
11.92%
Industrials
10.27%
Consumer Discreti.
7.69%
Communication Ser.
7.32%
Other
28.71%
Diversification
AUSF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.17%
FLCV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
AUSF
ROYALTY PHARMA
2.46%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
2.34%
AT&T
1.92%
CISCO-T
1.80%
ALTRIA GROUP
1.65%
IE000S9YS762
1.59%
WALMART INC
1.58%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.55%
CME GROUP
1.52%
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1.49%
TJX
1.48%
ELECTRONIC ARTS
1.47%
EVERGY
1.46%
CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS INC
1.45%
MICROSOFT-T
1.41%
FLCV
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.88%
TRAVELERS COS INC/THE
2.82%
FISERV
2.49%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.08%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
2.06%
STATE STREET
1.92%
EXELON CORP
1.79%
EOG RESOURCES
1.72%
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS
1.70%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
1.68%
PRUDENTIAL FINL
1.67%
US36828A1016
1.65%
AMERIPRISE FINANCE
1.64%
ACCENTURE PLC-A
1.64%
ABBVIE
1.47%
Frequently asked questions about AUSF and FLCV
How have the AUSF and FLCV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, AUSF is up 9.34% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCV has returned 14.09%. That puts FLCV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AUSF or FLCV?
Year-to-date, the AUSF ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to +$19M for FLCV.
Which ETF is more volatile: AUSF or FLCV?
Over the past year, AUSF had a volatility of 9.79%, while FLCV experienced 11.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: AUSF or FLCV?
As of June 12, 2026, AUSF holds $866.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCV manages $99.44 M.
What sectors do the AUSF and FLCV ETFs invest in?
AUSF leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, FLCV focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the AUSF ETF and FLCV ETF?
AUSF top holdings include ROYALTY PHARMA, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS and AT&T. FLCV holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, TRAVELERS COS INC/THE and FISERV.
Which ETF is more diversified: AUSF or FLCV?
AUSF holds 192 securities with 25.17% of its assets in the top 15. FLCV has 121 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.2%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
