Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ATFVvsPNQIETF Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) is part of the Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity segment. ATFV's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, PNQI's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. ATFV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.23%, versus 0.6% for PNQI. ATFV is down -4.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. PNQI performs worse with -13.88% YTD performance, and -$114M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ATFV and PNQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ATFV vs PNQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ATFV PNQI | -2.35%+1.15% | -6.08%-14.37% | -4.63%-13.88% | +49.95%+2.80% | +149.00%+83.91% | n/a-1.61% |
| Flows | ATFV PNQI | -$872K-$34M | +$14M-$116M | +$7M-$114M | +$80M-$290M | +$91M-$336M | --$445M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ATFV PNQI | +23.91%+18.57% | +27.84%+23.76% | +24.90%+20.66% | n/a+26.83% |
| Max drawdown | ATFV PNQI | -10.68%-16.19% | -16.74%-19.89% | -28.40%-23.96% | n/a-59.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | ATFV PNQI | 57d74d | 37d172d | 107d128d | n/a1433d |
ATFV | PNQI | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $32.36 | $46.35 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.20 | $46.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ATFV | PNQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ATFV | PNQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.36 | $46.35 |
| 1D performance | -2.52% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $115.75 M | $552.78 M |
| E/R | 1.23% | 0.6% |
ATFV | PNQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Fred Alger Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ CTA Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 27 | 67 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 4, 2021 | June 12, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ATFV and PNQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ATFV is down -4.63% year-to-date (YTD), while PNQI has lost -13.88%. That puts ATFV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ATFV or PNQI?
Year-to-date, the ATFV ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to -$114M for PNQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: ATFV or PNQI?
Over the past year, ATFV had a volatility of 27.84%, while PNQI experienced 23.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: ATFV or PNQI?
As of March 11, 2026, ATFV holds $115.75 M in assets under management (AUM), while PNQI manages $552.78 M.
What sectors do the ATFV and PNQI ETFs invest in?
ATFV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, PNQI focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ATFV ETF and PNQI ETF?
ATFV top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC. PNQI holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, META PLATFORMS and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ATFV or PNQI?
ATFV holds 29 securities with 68.37% of its assets in the top 15. PNQI has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.65%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
