Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ASCEvsPRFZETF Comparison
Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. ASCE's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, PRFZ's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. ASCE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.34% for PRFZ. ASCE is up 2.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. PRFZ performs worse with 2.25% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ASCE and PRFZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ASCE vs PRFZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ASCE PRFZ | -4.79%-4.41% | +1.60%-0.68% | +2.75%+2.25% | n/a+25.07% | n/a+49.60% | n/a+38.00% |
| Flows | ASCE PRFZ | +$5M+$19M | +$13M+$12M | +$11M+$26M | --$181M | --$119M | -+$20M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ASCE PRFZ | +18.40%+16.81% | n/a+22.34% | n/a+20.52% | n/a+21.31% |
| Max drawdown | ASCE PRFZ | -6.66%-5.90% | n/a-16.14% | n/a-26.51% | n/a-26.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | ASCE PRFZ | 12d47d | n/a46d | n/a283d | n/a283d |
ASCE | PRFZ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.48 | $46.77 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $27.48 | $46.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ASCE | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ASCE | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.48 | $46.77 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $49.19 M | $2.67 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.34% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ASCE and PRFZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, ASCE is up 2.75% year-to-date (YTD), while PRFZ has returned 2.25%. That puts ASCE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ASCE or PRFZ?
Year-to-date, the ASCE ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$26M for PRFZ.
Which ETF is bigger: ASCE or PRFZ?
As of March 9, 2026, ASCE holds $49.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while PRFZ manages $2.67 B.
What sectors do the ASCE and PRFZ ETFs invest in?
ASCE leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, PRFZ focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ASCE ETF and PRFZ ETF?
ASCE top holdings include POWELL INDUSTRIES, CENTURY ALUMINUM and EMCOR GROUP. PRFZ holds in its top three: OPENDOOR TECHNOLOGIES INC, HECLA MINING and IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ASCE or PRFZ?
ASCE holds 45 securities with 38.89% of its assets in the top 15. PRFZ has 1412 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.62%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
