ARWGvsQMOMETF Comparison
VS
Archer Growth ETF (ARWG) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. ARWG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, QMOM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Non-Energy Materials. ARWG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.28% for QMOM. ARWG is up 5.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. QMOM performs better with 13.58% YTD performance, and +$30M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ARWG and QMOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ARWG vs QMOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ARWG QMOM | +1.51%-5.38% | +8.14%-2.88% | +5.81%+13.58% | n/a+16.86% | n/a+59.21% | n/a+71.49% |
| Flows | ARWG QMOM | +$786K+$2M | +$2M+$6M | +$10M+$30M | -+$17M | -+$157M | -+$225M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ARWG QMOM | +24.22%+28.24% | n/a+24.81% | n/a+23.30% | n/a+24.08% |
| Max drawdown | ARWG QMOM | -7.30%-9.59% | n/a-12.61% | n/a-26.41% | n/a-26.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | ARWG QMOM | 15d45d | n/a38d | n/a414d | n/a414d |
Trading data
ARWG | QMOM | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.79 | $74.13 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $26.02 | $73.61 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ARWG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.79 | $74.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.89% | +0.70% |
| AuM | $13.97 M | $421.77 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.28% |
Characteristics
ARWG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Archer funds | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2025 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ARWG
USA
88.81%
Other
11.19%
QMOM
USA
97.56%
Other
2.44%
Sectors
ARWG
Technology
42.55%
Industrials
17.78%
Energy
14.43%
Healthcare
9.62%
Finance
7.37%
Other
8.25%
QMOM
Industrials
28.59%
Technology
21.35%
Non-Energy Materi.
20.07%
Energy
14.36%
Healthcare
7.62%
Other
8.01%
Advertisement
Diversification
ARWG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.41%
QMOM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.82%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
ARWG
RXO, Inc.
3.13%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
2.73%
MKS, Inc.
2.68%
Lam Research Corp.
2.68%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp.
2.64%
ASML Holding NV
2.62%
State Street Corp.
2.62%
Bloom Energy Corp.
2.58%
Freshworks, Inc.
2.56%
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
2.55%
Unity Software, Inc.
2.55%
Microchip Technology, Inc.
2.53%
Cognex Corp.
2.52%
Nucor Corp.
2.51%
Centene Corp.
2.51%
QMOM
Flex Ltd.
2.98%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.83%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
2.81%
Planet Labs PBC
2.53%
Corning, Inc.
2.31%
nVent Electric Plc
2.28%
BorgWarner, Inc.
2.28%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.21%
Southern Copper Corp.
2.16%
Jabil, Inc.
2.14%
ATI, Inc.
2.10%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
2.07%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.07%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.05%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
2.00%
Frequently asked questions about ARWG and QMOM
How have the ARWG and QMOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, ARWG is up 5.81% year-to-date (YTD), while QMOM has returned 13.58%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ARWG or QMOM?
Year-to-date, the ARWG ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$30M for QMOM.
Which ETF is bigger: ARWG or QMOM?
As of July 17, 2026, ARWG holds $13.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMOM manages $421.77 M.
What sectors do the ARWG and QMOM ETFs invest in?
ARWG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, QMOM focuses on Industrials, Technology and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the ARWG ETF and QMOM ETF?
ARWG top holdings include RXO, Inc., Texas Instruments Incorporated and MKS, Inc.. QMOM holds in its top three: Flex Ltd., Dell Technologies, Inc. and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ARWG or QMOM?
ARWG holds 40 securities with 39.41% of its assets in the top 15. QMOM has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.82%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
