Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AQWAvsGUNRETF Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund ETF
Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund ETF (GUNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. AQWA's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, GUNR's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. AQWA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.47% for GUNR. AQWA is up 1.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. GUNR performs better with 19.92% YTD performance, and +$492M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AQWA and GUNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AQWA vs GUNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AQWA GUNR | -7.56%+4.00% | +0.38%+21.47% | +1.87%+19.92% | +15.77%+49.53% | +42.57%+45.91% | n/a+74.76% |
| Flows | AQWA GUNR | -$5M+$93M | +$6M+$492M | +$7M+$492M | +$17M+$429M | +$17M-$1.43B | -+$618M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AQWA GUNR | +13.14%+17.77% | +14.37%+15.38% | +13.74%+14.64% | n/a+16.90% |
| Max drawdown | AQWA GUNR | -8.04%-3.97% | -8.46%-12.82% | -14.57%-18.53% | n/a-23.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | AQWA GUNR | 15d10d | 35d65d | 211d427d | n/a1239d |
AQWA | GUNR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.10 | $54.13 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $19.11 | $55.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AQWA | GUNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AQWA | GUNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.10 | $54.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -1.62% |
| AuM | $26.27 M | $7.41 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.47% |
AQWA | GUNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Clean Water Industry Index | Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 117 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 12, 2021 | September 16, 2011 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AQWA and GUNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, AQWA is up 1.87% year-to-date (YTD), while GUNR has returned 19.92%. That puts GUNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AQWA or GUNR?
Year-to-date, the AQWA ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$492M for GUNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: AQWA or GUNR?
Over the past year, AQWA had a volatility of 14.37%, while GUNR experienced 15.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: AQWA or GUNR?
As of March 13, 2026, AQWA holds $26.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while GUNR manages $7.41 B.
What sectors do the AQWA and GUNR ETFs invest in?
AQWA leans toward sectors like Industrials and Utilities. Meanwhile, GUNR focuses on Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the AQWA ETF and GUNR ETF?
AQWA top holdings include US31488V1070, PENTAIR PLC and XYLEM. GUNR holds in its top three: EXXON, CORTEVA INC and CHEVRON TEXACO.
Which ETF is more diversified: AQWA or GUNR?
AQWA holds 39 securities with 77.19% of its assets in the top 15. GUNR has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.29%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
