Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AQWAvsGNRETF Comparison
Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. AQWA's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, GNR's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. AQWA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.4% for GNR. AQWA is up 1.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. GNR performs better with 16.68% YTD performance, and +$288M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AQWA and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AQWA vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AQWA GNR | -7.56%-0.35% | +0.38%+18.77% | +1.87%+16.68% | +15.77%+43.08% | +42.57%+45.26% | n/a+67.99% |
| Flows | AQWA GNR | -$5M+$46M | +$6M+$365M | +$7M+$288M | +$17M+$826M | +$17M+$102M | -+$1.83B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AQWA GNR | +13.14%+19.19% | +14.37%+17.00% | +13.74%+15.75% | n/a+18.20% |
| Max drawdown | AQWA GNR | -8.04%-4.57% | -8.46%-14.74% | -14.57%-19.80% | n/a-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | AQWA GNR | 15d11d | 35d82d | 211d457d | n/a758d |
AQWA | GNR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.10 | $72.43 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $19.11 | $73.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AQWA | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AQWA | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.10 | $72.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -1.66% |
| AuM | $26.27 M | $4.76 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.4% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AQWA and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, AQWA is up 1.87% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 16.68%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AQWA or GNR?
Year-to-date, the AQWA ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$288M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: AQWA or GNR?
Over the past year, AQWA had a volatility of 14.37%, while GNR experienced 17%.
Which ETF is bigger: AQWA or GNR?
As of March 13, 2026, AQWA holds $26.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $4.76 B.
What sectors do the AQWA and GNR ETFs invest in?
AQWA leans toward sectors like Industrials and Utilities. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the AQWA ETF and GNR ETF?
AQWA top holdings include US31488V1070, PENTAIR PLC and XYLEM. GNR holds in its top three: NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD.
Which ETF is more diversified: AQWA or GNR?
AQWA holds 39 securities with 77.19% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 89 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
