Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AOTSvsLRGGETF Comparison
AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Macquarie Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. AOTS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, LRGG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. AOTS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.45% for LRGG. AOTS is down -12.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$915K in YTD flows. LRGG performs better with -9.23% YTD performance, and -$51M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AOTS and LRGG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AOTS vs LRGG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AOTS LRGG | +0.67%-0.48% | n/a-8.75% | -12.62%-9.23% | n/a+3.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | AOTS LRGG | -$1M-$33M | --$50M | +$915K-$51M | -+$246M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AOTS LRGG | n/a+15.23% | n/a+18.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | AOTS LRGG | n/a-11.31% | n/a-13.48% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | AOTS LRGG | n/a73d | n/a134d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
AOTS | LRGG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 4:34 PM | $26.33 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.39 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AOTS | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AOTS | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $26.33 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.23% |
| AuM | $2.18 M | $297.34 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.45% |
AOTS | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | AOT Invest | Macquarie |
| Benchmark | AOT VettaFi Software Platform | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 23 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 22, 2025 | May 15, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AOTS and LRGG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, AOTS is down -12.62% year-to-date (YTD), while LRGG has lost -9.23%. That puts LRGG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AOTS or LRGG?
Year-to-date, the AOTS ETF saw +$915K in flows, compared to -$51M for LRGG.
Which ETF is bigger: AOTS or LRGG?
As of March 12, 2026, AOTS holds $2.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while LRGG manages $297.34 M.
What sectors do the AOTS and LRGG ETFs invest in?
AOTS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, LRGG focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the AOTS ETF and LRGG ETF?
AOTS top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and AMAZON.COM INC. LRGG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: AOTS or LRGG?
AOTS holds 50 securities with 73.94% of its assets in the top 15. LRGG has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 86.95%.
This New ETF Allows You to Invest in the Software That Runs the Economy
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
