Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AOTGvsIWYETF Comparison
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. AOTG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, IWY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. AOTG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.2% for IWY. AOTG is down -9.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. IWY performs better with -4.79% YTD performance, and +$137M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AOTG and IWY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AOTG vs IWY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AOTG IWY | -0.94%-1.35% | -10.84%-5.63% | -9.57%-4.79% | +28.63%+24.82% | +110.68%+110.54% | n/a+103.14% |
| Flows | AOTG IWY | -+$26M | +$2M-$373M | +$2M+$137M | +$26M+$658M | +$37M+$3.99B | -+$5.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AOTG IWY | +25.73%+15.73% | +29.10%+22.35% | +25.26%+19.23% | n/a+21.50% |
| Max drawdown | AOTG IWY | -14.49%-7.20% | -18.60%-15.39% | -27.41%-23.25% | n/a-32.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | AOTG IWY | 64d73d | 44d45d | 197d192d | n/a715d |
AOTG | IWY | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $50.54 | $259.70 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $50.50 | $263.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AOTG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AOTG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.54 | $259.70 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | -1.46% |
| AuM | $82.45 M | $15.55 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.2% |
AOTG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AOT Invest | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Top 200 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 105 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 29, 2022 | September 22, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AOTG and IWY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, AOTG is down -9.57% year-to-date (YTD), while IWY has lost -4.79%. That puts IWY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AOTG or IWY?
Year-to-date, the AOTG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$137M for IWY.
Which ETF is more volatile: AOTG or IWY?
Over the past year, AOTG had a volatility of 29.1%, while IWY experienced 22.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: AOTG or IWY?
As of March 11, 2026, AOTG holds $82.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWY manages $15.55 B.
What sectors do the AOTG and IWY ETFs invest in?
AOTG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, IWY focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the AOTG ETF and IWY ETF?
AOTG top holdings include NVIDIA, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES and ALPHABET INC-CL. IWY holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: AOTG or IWY?
AOTG holds 40 securities with 78.41% of its assets in the top 15. IWY has 111 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.69%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
