Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AMOMvsPEPSETF Comparison
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) is part of the Options Strategies segment. AMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, PEPS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. AMOM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.29% for PEPS. AMOM is up 2.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. PEPS performs worse with -0.51% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AMOM and PEPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AMOM vs PEPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AMOM PEPS | -3.38%-2.34% | +0.28%-1.69% | +2.22%-0.51% | +34.29%+27.07% | +85.82%n/a | +57.22%n/a |
| Flows | AMOM PEPS | -- | +$5M- | +$5M- | -$6M-$1M | +$6M- | +$18M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AMOM PEPS | +22.39%+13.31% | +25.23%+19.56% | +23.03%n/a | +23.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown | AMOM PEPS | -6.71%-3.80% | -15.45%-15.21% | -30.25%n/a | -39.47%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | AMOM PEPS | 14d37d | 37d45d | 253dn/a | 843dn/a |
AMOM | PEPS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:00 PM | $48.86 | $28.79 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $49.74 | $29.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
AMOM | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.86 | $28.79 |
| 1D performance | -1.77% | -1.44% |
| AuM | $28.61 M | $24.82 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.29% |
AMOM | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Qraft AI ETFs | Morgan Stanley |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 154 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2019 | November 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AMOM and PEPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, AMOM is up 2.22% year-to-date (YTD), while PEPS has lost -0.51%. That puts AMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AMOM or PEPS?
Year-to-date, the AMOM ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to - for PEPS.
Which ETF is more volatile: AMOM or PEPS?
Over the past year, AMOM had a volatility of 25.23%, while PEPS experienced 19.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: AMOM or PEPS?
As of March 11, 2026, AMOM holds $28.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while PEPS manages $24.82 M.
What sectors do the AMOM and PEPS ETFs invest in?
AMOM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PEPS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the AMOM ETF and PEPS ETF?
AMOM top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and TESLA. PEPS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: AMOM or PEPS?
AMOM holds 48 securities with 55.13% of its assets in the top 15. PEPS has 162 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.81%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
