Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AIVLvsULVMETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. AI Enhanced Value Fund ETF (AIVL) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. AIVL's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, ULVM's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. AIVL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.25% for ULVM. AIVL is up 3.7% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. ULVM performs better with 6.02% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AIVL and ULVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AIVL vs ULVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AIVL ULVM | -2.07%-2.19% | +4.00%+5.65% | +3.70%+6.02% | +11.17%+23.35% | +43.23%+66.70% | +44.11%+77.25% |
| Flows | AIVL ULVM | -$3M+$5M | -$9M+$19M | -$6M+$19M | -$34M+$54M | -$114M-$69M | -$263M-$413M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AIVL ULVM | +10.33%+11.13% | +15.12%+17.01% | +12.95%+14.04% | +14.69%+15.72% |
| Max drawdown | AIVL ULVM | -3.66%-3.52% | -11.97%-13.34% | -14.35%-18.21% | -19.08%-19.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | AIVL ULVM | 8d12d | 49d46d | 211d232d | 779d717d |
AIVL | ULVM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $118.74 | $96.52 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $119.13 | $96.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AIVL | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AIVL | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $118.74 | $96.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $387.46 M | $236.46 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.25% |
AIVL | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 797 | 118 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2006 | October 24, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AIVL and ULVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, AIVL is up 3.7% year-to-date (YTD), while ULVM has returned 6.02%. That puts ULVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AIVL or ULVM?
Year-to-date, the AIVL ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$19M for ULVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: AIVL or ULVM?
Over the past year, AIVL had a volatility of 15.12%, while ULVM experienced 17.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: AIVL or ULVM?
As of March 10, 2026, AIVL holds $387.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while ULVM manages $236.46 M.
What sectors do the AIVL and ULVM ETFs invest in?
AIVL leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, ULVM focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the AIVL ETF and ULVM ETF?
AIVL top holdings include TELEDYNE TECH, MEDTRONIC PLC and INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE INC. ULVM holds in its top three: CENTERPOINT ENERGY, REALTY INCOME REIT and AMEREN.
Which ETF is more diversified: AIVL or ULVM?
AIVL holds 876 securities with 44.76% of its assets in the top 15. ULVM has 121 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.39%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
