Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AIVLvsLGLVETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. AI Enhanced Value Fund ETF (AIVL) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. AIVL's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, LGLV's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. AIVL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.12% for LGLV. AIVL is up 3.7% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. LGLV performs better with 4.32% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AIVL and LGLV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AIVL vs LGLV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AIVL LGLV | -2.07%-1.37% | +4.00%+5.14% | +3.70%+4.32% | +11.17%+7.83% | +43.23%+48.41% | +44.11%+63.87% |
| Flows | AIVL LGLV | -$3M+$28M | -$9M-$9M | -$6M+$7M | -$34M+$186M | -$114M+$253M | -$263M+$332M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AIVL LGLV | +10.33%+8.53% | +15.12%+12.90% | +12.95%+11.01% | +14.69%+13.01% |
| Max drawdown | AIVL LGLV | -3.66%-3.29% | -11.97%-9.65% | -14.35%-10.12% | -19.08%-17.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | AIVL LGLV | 8d8d | 49d43d | 211d166d | 779d713d |
AIVL | LGLV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $118.74 | $182.13 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $119.13 | $183.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AIVL | LGLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AIVL | LGLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $118.74 | $182.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.57% |
| AuM | $387.46 M | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.12% |
AIVL | LGLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | SPDR |
| Benchmark | - | SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index |
| N° of holdings | 797 | 160 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2006 | February 20, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AIVL and LGLV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, AIVL is up 3.7% year-to-date (YTD), while LGLV has returned 4.32%. That puts LGLV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AIVL or LGLV?
Year-to-date, the AIVL ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$7M for LGLV.
Which ETF is more volatile: AIVL or LGLV?
Over the past year, AIVL had a volatility of 15.12%, while LGLV experienced 12.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: AIVL or LGLV?
As of March 10, 2026, AIVL holds $387.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while LGLV manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the AIVL and LGLV ETFs invest in?
AIVL leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, LGLV focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the AIVL ETF and LGLV ETF?
AIVL top holdings include TELEDYNE TECH, MEDTRONIC PLC and INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE INC. LGLV holds in its top three: JOHNSON&JOHNSON, VULCAN MATERIALS and WALMART INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: AIVL or LGLV?
AIVL holds 876 securities with 44.76% of its assets in the top 15. LGLV has 166 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.6%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
