New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

AGGMvsPZTETF Comparison

ETF 1
AGGM

iShares 1-10 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

This fund is part of
US Aggregate Bonds
+0.03%
VS
ETF 2
PZT

Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
-0%

iShares 1-10 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGM) belongs to the US Aggregate Bonds segment. Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. AGGM's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, PZT's top sector exposures are Municipal. AGGM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.28% for PZT. AGGM is down -1.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. PZT performs worse with -5.78% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AGGM and PZT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

AGGM vs PZT performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

0 M5 M10 M15 M20 M25 MSep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
AGGM
PZT
+0.07%-0.53%
-1.62%-6.24%
-1.64%-5.78%
-1.98%-5.69%
+13.50%+6.62%
-3.33%-7.53%
Flows
AGGM
PZT
+$25M-$1M
-$592K+$239K
+$10M+$6M
+$4M+$2M
-$237M+$52M
-$255M+$41M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
AGGM
PZT
+3.84%+7.43%
+3.65%+4.89%
+4.76%+5.83%
+5.83%+5.75%
Max drawdown
AGGM
PZT
-2.74%-8.98%
-4.29%-10.03%
-4.82%-10.03%
-17.94%-18.68%
Max drawdown duration
AGGM
PZT
52d92d
229d229d
318d229d
1776d1747d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
AGGM
PZT
Last sale
10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
$20.90
Previous close
10/15/2026
$20.82
Consolidated volume
10/15/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
AGGM
PZT
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
AGGM
PZT
Last price
–
$20.90
1D performance
–
+0.38%
AuM$130.29 M$130.87 M
E/R0.03%0.28%
Characteristics
AGGM
PZT
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProvideriSharesInvesco
BenchmarkBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Government/Credit IndexICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index
N° of holdings1895767
Asset classBondsBonds
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJanuary 5, 2007October 11, 2007
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

AGGM
USA
70%
Other
30%
PZT
USA
69.78%
Other
30.22%

Sectors

AGGM
Sovereign
45.32%
Finance
10.81%
Industrials
8.2%
Other
35.67%
PZT
Municipal
69.78%
Other
30.22%
Advertisement

Diversification

AGGM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

20.48%
PZT

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

11.73%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026
AGGM
US3132DWDC47
1.88%
US3140W55E07
1.86%
US3132E0A448
1.74%
FN MA4305, 2% 1mar2051, USD (ABS)
1.61%
US3132D6BJ82
1.46%
US3140W4ZG58
1.35%
US3132DVAF22
1.30%
US3137HNN466
1.29%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
1.19%
G2 MB0025, 5% 20nov2054, USD (ABS)
1.18%
US3142GYJU00
1.18%
US3142GW2D07
1.18%
US3140XMXE15
1.12%
US3140W3PZ66
1.09%
US31427SBN71
1.06%
PZT
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1jul2054, USD (2024A)
1.74%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD
0.89%
New York Dormitory Authority, 4.25% 1may2052, USD (2022A)
0.87%
Battery Park City Authority, 5.25% 1nov2055, USD (2025)
0.80%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2050, USD
0.78%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.25% 1may2054, USD (2024A)
0.73%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2055, USD
0.73%
US649519DW23
0.72%
Monroe Industrial Development Corp., 4% 1jul2050, USD (2020A)
0.69%
New York Liberty Development Corp., 2.45% 15sep2069, USD (2019)
0.68%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 4% 15feb2047, USD
0.66%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 1may2052, USD (2022A)
0.63%
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 4% 15feb2044, USD
0.63%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1oct2054, USD (2024)
0.60%
New York Power Authority, 4% 15nov2045, USD
0.60%
Frequently asked questions about AGGM and PZT

How have the AGGM and PZT ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, AGGM is down -1.64% year-to-date (YTD), while PZT has lost -5.78%. That puts AGGM better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AGGM or PZT?

Year-to-date, the AGGM ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$6M for PZT.

Which ETF is more volatile: AGGM or PZT?

Over the past year, AGGM had a volatility of 3.65%, while PZT experienced 4.89%.

Which ETF is bigger: AGGM or PZT?

As of October 16, 2026, AGGM holds $130.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while PZT manages $130.87 M.

What sectors do the AGGM and PZT ETFs invest in?

AGGM leans toward sectors like Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, PZT focuses on Municipal.

What are the top holdings of the AGGM ETF and PZT ETF?

AGGM top holdings include US3132DWDC47, US3140W55E07 and US3132E0A448. PZT holds in its top three: New York Dormitory Authority, 5.5% 1jul2054, USD (2024A), Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., 5% 15feb2042, USD and New York Dormitory Authority, 4.25% 1may2052, USD (2022A).

Which ETF is more diversified: AGGM or PZT?

AGGM holds 1919 securities with 20.48% of its assets in the top 15. PZT has 1312 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.73%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026