AFSCvsVTWOETF Comparison
VS
abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. AFSC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, VTWO's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. AFSC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.09%, versus 0.06% for VTWO. AFSC is up 23.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. VTWO performs worse with 18.68% YTD performance, and +$839M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AFSC and VTWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
AFSC vs VTWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AFSC VTWO | -3.86%-3.06% | +5.45%+2.22% | +23.82%+18.68% | +23.71%+24.22% | n/a+64.19% | n/a+39.43% |
| Flows | AFSC VTWO | +$24K+$328M | -$875K+$279M | -$6M+$839M | -$48M+$1.67B | -+$5.31B | -+$6.81B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AFSC VTWO | +16.68%+15.12% | +18.56%+18.88% | n/a+21.14% | n/a+22.46% |
| Max drawdown | AFSC VTWO | -6.74%-4.75% | -10.27%-10.99% | n/a-27.51% | n/a-31.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | AFSC VTWO | 22d24d | 39d82d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
Trading data
AFSC | VTWO | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.34 | $117.51 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $37.68 | $119.14 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AFSC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexAFSC | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
AFSC | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.34 | $117.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.88% | -1.37% |
| AuM | $9.93 M | $17.15 B |
| E/R | 1.09% | 0.06% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
AFSC
USA
88.79%
Other
11.21%
VTWO
USA
92.69%
Other
7.31%
Sectors
AFSC
Finance
24.24%
Healthcare
18.6%
Industrials
14.14%
Technology
13.44%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.38%
Other
22.2%
VTWO
Finance
26.17%
Healthcare
19.29%
Technology
11.7%
Industrials
10.34%
Other
32.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
AFSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.32%
VTWO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
AFSC
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
3.45%
Brinker International, Inc.
3.16%
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International Plc
3.16%
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
3.13%
Quaker Houghton
3.11%
Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida
2.98%
Ameris Bancorp
2.84%
Wintrust Financial Corp.
2.84%
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
2.67%
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
2.59%
AZZ, Inc.
2.56%
JFrog Ltd.
2.48%
StoneX Group, Inc.
2.47%
PJT Partners, Inc.
2.45%
Impinj, Inc.
2.43%
VTWO
Moog, Inc.
0.35%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.35%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.34%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.32%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.31%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.31%
Glaukos Corp.
0.30%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.29%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.28%
JFrog Ltd.
0.27%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.27%
HealthEquity, Inc.
0.27%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.26%
Frequently asked questions about AFSC and VTWO
How have the AFSC and VTWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, AFSC is up 23.82% year-to-date (YTD), while VTWO has returned 18.68%. That puts AFSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AFSC or VTWO?
Year-to-date, the AFSC ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$839M for VTWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: AFSC or VTWO?
Over the past year, AFSC had a volatility of 18.56%, while VTWO experienced 18.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: AFSC or VTWO?
As of September 8, 2026, AFSC holds $9.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTWO manages $17.15 B.
What sectors do the AFSC and VTWO ETFs invest in?
AFSC leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, VTWO focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the AFSC ETF and VTWO ETF?
AFSC top holdings include American Healthcare REIT, Inc., Brinker International, Inc. and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International Plc. VTWO holds in its top three: Moog, Inc., Hut 8 Corp. and UMB Financial Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: AFSC or VTWO?
AFSC holds 43 securities with 42.32% of its assets in the top 15. VTWO has 1986 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.51%.
Advertisement
Latest news about AFSC & VTWO
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
July 29, 2024
VTWO
Value ETFs Shine Amid Lower-Than-Expected Inflation
July 15, 2024
VTWO
Advertisement
Advertisement
