Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AFMCvsFSMDETF Comparison
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. AFMC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, FSMD's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. AFMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.15% for FSMD. AFMC is up 2.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. FSMD performs worse with 0.19% YTD performance, and +$174M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AFMC and FSMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AFMC vs FSMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AFMC FSMD | -4.45%-6.16% | +1.14%-1.36% | +2.67%+0.19% | +19.06%+18.04% | +62.84%+48.65% | +50.27%+42.12% |
| Flows | AFMC FSMD | +$18M+$59M | +$35M+$215M | +$35M+$174M | +$82M+$958M | +$120M+$1.77B | +$119M+$1.82B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AFMC FSMD | +14.85%+14.06% | +19.50%+19.01% | +17.76%+16.90% | +19.49%+18.25% |
| Max drawdown | AFMC FSMD | -6.20%-7.06% | -13.21%-13.29% | -21.83%-22.27% | -25.69%-22.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | AFMC FSMD | 18d15d | 46d46d | 289d289d | 752d289d |
AFMC | FSMD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.24 | $44.23 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.35 | $44.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AFMC | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AFMC | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.24 | $44.23 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $132.52 M | $2.08 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.15% |
AFMC | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 258 | 546 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2019 | February 26, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AFMC and FSMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, AFMC is up 2.67% year-to-date (YTD), while FSMD has returned 0.19%. That puts AFMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AFMC or FSMD?
Year-to-date, the AFMC ETF saw +$35M in flows, compared to +$174M for FSMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: AFMC or FSMD?
Over the past year, AFMC had a volatility of 19.5%, while FSMD experienced 19.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: AFMC or FSMD?
As of March 12, 2026, AFMC holds $132.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSMD manages $2.08 B.
What sectors do the AFMC and FSMD ETFs invest in?
AFMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, FSMD focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the AFMC ETF and FSMD ETF?
AFMC top holdings include MUELLER INDUSTRIES, FEDERATED HERMES and EXELIXIS. FSMD holds in its top three: GB00BRXH2664, CIENA and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA.
Which ETF is more diversified: AFMC or FSMD?
AFMC holds 265 securities with 15.32% of its assets in the top 15. FSMD has 584 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.83%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
