AFLGvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. AFLG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. AFLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.15% for RECS. AFLG is up 13.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$227M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 9.96% YTD performance, and +$675M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AFLG and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
AFLG vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AFLG RECS | -1.48%-0.51% | +3.35%+5.80% | +13.70%+9.96% | +17.87%+15.94% | +78.24%+78.06% | +76.26%+87.68% |
| Flows | AFLG RECS | +$32M-$12M | +$97M+$44M | +$227M+$675M | +$271M+$1.63B | +$636M+$4.49B | +$637M+$4.67B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AFLG RECS | +10.56%+10.50% | +11.84%+12.01% | +14.17%+14.56% | +16.21%+16.59% |
| Max drawdown | AFLG RECS | -2.78%-2.96% | -8.14%-8.79% | -17.58%-18.49% | -23.51%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | AFLG RECS | 45d23d | 47d66d | 205d126d | 741d573d |
Trading data
AFLG | RECS | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.68 | $45.19 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $44.25 | $44.91 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AFLG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexAFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
AFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.68 | $45.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.97% | +0.62% |
| AuM | $768.29 M | $5.99 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
AFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 213 | 442 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2019 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
AFLG
USA
94.89%
Other
5.11%
RECS
USA
99.05%
Other
0.95%
Sectors
AFLG
Technology
43.65%
Finance
13.56%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.23%
Healthcare
7.07%
Other
28.49%
RECS
Technology
41.49%
Finance
13.66%
Healthcare
8.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.77%
Industrials
7.76%
Other
20.86%
Advertisement
Diversification
AFLG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.51%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
AFLG
NVIDIA Corp.
7.74%
Apple, Inc.
6.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.72%
Microsoft Corp.
3.78%
Broadcom Inc.
2.50%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.33%
Lam Research Corp.
1.42%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.12%
Newmont Corp.
1.08%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.97%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
0.95%
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.95%
Altria Group, Inc.
0.95%
FirstEnergy Corp.
0.90%
The Allstate Corp.
0.87%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
12.00%
Apple, Inc.
11.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.90%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.40%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.29%
Bank of America Corp.
2.03%
Chevron Corp.
1.55%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.40%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.20%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.13%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.08%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.03%
Starbucks Corp.
1.03%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
0.97%
CVS Health Corp.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about AFLG and RECS
How have the AFLG and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, AFLG is up 13.7% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 9.96%. That puts AFLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AFLG or RECS?
Year-to-date, the AFLG ETF saw +$227M in flows, compared to +$675M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: AFLG or RECS?
Over the past year, AFLG had a volatility of 11.84%, while RECS experienced 12.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: AFLG or RECS?
As of September 9, 2026, AFLG holds $768.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $5.99 B.
What sectors do the AFLG and RECS ETFs invest in?
AFLG leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the AFLG ETF and RECS ETF?
AFLG top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: AFLG or RECS?
AFLG holds 213 securities with 37.51% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 451 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.24%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
