Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACWXvsGXUSETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. ACWX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.18% for GXUS. ACWX is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$744M in YTD flows. GXUS performs better with 4.91% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWX and GXUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACWX vs GXUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWX GXUS | -4.54%-3.65% | +5.73%+7.09% | +4.77%+4.91% | +30.42%+29.73% | +64.34%n/a | +45.36%n/a |
| Flows | ACWX GXUS | +$387M- | +$929M- | +$744M- | +$2.34B-$36K | +$2.34B- | +$3.60B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWX GXUS | +14.83%+14.45% | +15.26%+14.44% | +13.45%n/a | +14.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ACWX GXUS | -7.09%-8.10% | -13.37%-13.10% | -13.37%n/a | -30.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWX GXUS | 14d9d | 43d44d | 43dn/a | 1065dn/a |
ACWX | GXUS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $70.22 | $58.47 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $70.29 | $58.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACWX | GXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACWX | GXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $70.22 | $58.47 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $8.97 B | $586.35 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.18% |
ACWX | GXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | Solactive GBS Global ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 1591 | 2559 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2008 | June 7, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACWX and GXUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ACWX is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD), while GXUS has returned 4.91%. That puts GXUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWX or GXUS?
Year-to-date, the ACWX ETF saw +$744M in flows, compared to - for GXUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWX or GXUS?
Over the past year, ACWX had a volatility of 15.26%, while GXUS experienced 14.44%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWX or GXUS?
As of March 11, 2026, ACWX holds $8.97 B in assets under management (AUM), while GXUS manages $586.35 M.
What sectors do the ACWX and GXUS ETFs invest in?
ACWX leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, GXUS focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACWX ETF and GXUS ETF?
ACWX top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR. GXUS holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWX or GXUS?
ACWX holds 1731 securities with 16.93% of its assets in the top 15. GXUS has 2773 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.9%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
